My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5217 S 2ND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
S 2ND AVE
>
5217
>
5217 S 2ND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 6:49:43 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 12:23:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
S 2ND AVE
Street Number
5217
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />To: Bab Royce <br />From: Wnit Cooper <br />Date: May 17, 1973 <br />Sub�ect: I. 0. 0. F'. Building <br />� �: �� , � � i� � <br />II <br />-�! <br />i i':i,L <br />It is my opinion 5hrt i.ris building is unsafe. The stairs on the <br />south side o; tne oui.ding �re saggi.ng and detad�ed and could <br />c¢use serious injury lf an attempt is mnde to u�e them. These <br />stairs must be removed. The stairc on the eusi: end are in the <br />same condition. These must be removed, nlso. <br />There are many signs of structural deterioration. All three <br />floorc are sagging in various pl¢ces nnd in vurying degrees. The <br />north wall is leuning inxard on the top floor. The south c+all is <br />weakened near the tront due to a support member being ramoved. <br />The building lias a number of places through which illegal ent:,y <br />may bc mnde. It is 907 vncant with only Mr. and Mrs. Fred Doph <br />living in the apnrtment on the m�in floor, north side. The apart- <br />ment on the loxer floor, east, was occupied by Mr. Dopl�'s sister- <br />in-lnx, xho is now living with and coring 1'or ¢n elderly fiiend. <br />Mr. Doph has stated that it is not likely she will return. <br />All of these things considered, thic bu'_lding is especially sub- <br />ject to van3alism. If a fire xere started iu this lar6e, raostly <br />vacant structure, it wuu.ld spre¢d easily and rnpidly and become <br />totally i.nvolved. Although Lhere is good separation on '�he north <br />rsnd east sides, the lnrge size and combustible construction of <br />this building wauld be considered nn exposure haznrd in the event <br />of fire. <br />With all of the factors involved and the likelyhood that no steps <br />will ever be taken to upgrnde the building, even if it were struc- <br />turally feasible, I would recoramend that abatement proceedings be <br />initiated, ana thnt this building be demolished. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.