Laserfiche WebLink
Craig Van Sant <br />Appeal I.1-89 <br />Page -4- <br />h Accordingly, the decision of January 12, 1990, with regard to the commercial <br />D Non -Conforming Use of the subject property remains as set forth therein. <br />There was not a commercial Non -Conforming Use for the property. Likewise, the <br />> H vA Applicant has not adequately shown that there was _xisting multi -family <br />H > 3 residential use on the subject property. Therefore, there is no <br />q Z ~ non -conforming designation of the multi -family use for this property. As set <br />K H forth in the January 12, 1990, decision, the proposed multi -family residential <br />H use is contrary to the R-2 zoning designation. <br />ti r� <br />Z X Done and dated this Bth day of March, 1990. <br />HC <br />OZOE <br />"i es M. Driscoll <br />r H Z <br />HH <br />N <br />~ The decision on this application has been made by the }fearing Examiner based <br />C 0y <br />on the authority gra,rted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It is final unless <br />2 y the following procedure is followed: <br />H O fA <br />1. Within ten (10) working days (Ketch 22, 1990,) after the Bearing <br />Examiner's action on the request for reconsideration, the aggrieved <br />party may file a written appeal with the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, <br />3002 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA 98201. <br />If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the Everett City Council <br />for further consideration. <br />