Laserfiche WebLink
Craig Van Sant <br />Appeal 11-89 <br />Page -7 <br />x <br />t,tr <br />C�H <br />In Washington, the intent to abandon a non -conforming use is a question of <br />9 <br />In <br />Fact for the trier of fact, Bartz vs. Board of Adjustment, 492 P.2d 1374, 80 <br />H <br />y 3 <br />Wn.2d 209. It must, however, be established that the non -conforming use <br />�3 <br />z~' <br />existed before it can be determined if it was abandoned. No such use did <br />K <br />H <br />exist for the non -conforming residential use of the subject property and, <br />V <br />H IV <br />therefore, any multi -family residential use is contrary to the R-2 zoning <br />H <br />EnC <br />designation and its allowed uses. <br />yAlthough <br />a commercial non -conforming use may have existed on -site, it has been <br />abandoned. The Washington Court of Appeals has decided that if a <br />H <br />M CCy7 O <br />non -conforming use is abandoned or discontinued, the right to continue it <br />comes to an end, Andrew vs. King County, 582 P.2d 509, 21 Wn.App. 566. <br />yH <br />Because the previous owner's activities were not continuous commercial <br />activity, the commercial non -conforming use was discontinued and abandoned. <br />tyro <br />H,zy <br />There was not a commercial non -conforming use for the subject property. <br />nCti <br />The issuance of the Certification of a Non -Conforming Use and Building for the <br />33 <br />[� <br />n <br />property at 4228 South Third Avenue, Everett, Washington, was in error and <br />Z <br />HO N <br />should be withdrawn. <br />Done and dated this 12th day of January, 1990. <br />James M. Driscoll <br />Hearing Examiner <br />IR S The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing Examiner based <br />on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It is final unless <br />the following procedure is followed: <br />1. Any aggrieved party of record who has actively participated in the <br />hearing before the Examiner may file a written request with the Examiner <br />for reconsideration within ten (10) working days of the date of the <br />Examiner's decision. The Examiner's mailing address is City Hall, 3002 <br />Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA, 96201 and the location of the Examiner's <br />office is 2731 Wetmore Building, 3rd floor. The request shall <br />explicitly set forth alleged errors of procedure, fact or law. The <br />Examiner shall act within ten (10) working days after tLie date of the <br />filing of the request for reconsideration by either denying the request, <br />Issuing a revised decision or calling for an additional public hearing. <br />If an additional hearing is required, notice of said hearing shall be <br />+ mailed to all parties of record not less than five (5) working day prior <br />to the hearing date. The final date for requesting reconsideration is <br />January 29, 1990. <br />2. Within ten (10) working days after the Hearing Examiner's action on the <br />request for reconsideration, the aggrieved party may file a written <br />appeal with the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 3002 Wetmore Avenue, <br />Everett, WA 98201. <br />If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the Everett City Council <br />for further consideration. <br />