5005 S 3RD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

nr,r.r' rrow ; or• nrrr.r.cn�a•r �, , ROIIIT 1. Thc fo].lo:•�iny arc the speci.al ci�:ciimstances �•:hich apply torny proP��Y i•i1».cl� deprS.ve me of riy;�l•s ancl privileges �•�hicL• arc, enjoycd hyother pr.opert•ic� in tl�e vicinity uncicr the identical zone clas�ificat•ion. Origi�al Lot segrega[ion makes compliance with 19,16..030 for duplex almost impossible, An additional lot woutd hAve [o be used which would dvi�e the land cost out of propor[ion [o const.ruction costs. POI17T 2. The variance I am �equesting a�ill not he detrimental to tl��e public �•relfare or injurious to the properties or impro�•emerits in tl�e vicinity of a zone in i•�hich my prope�•ty �s located because: The population density will s[ay well within Lhe guidelines allowed by the zoning•code. The new residen[al construc�ion will help upgrade [he neigh- borhood. Add higer Cax revenue than sing'e family residence. POI:�i 3. Tf this variance is.not granted, an u�inec�essary hardshi� t�ill co�tinue to t1�e oo-rner of this property, the cause of whic}i is beyond }�is contro2 because: Property inflation c'os[s, make use oC land for mufEiple family units a'better use, :h'an for single family dwellings in this area. As houses would be over priced and would over build the area in relationship to exis[ing housing in the neigliborhood thus making financing unobtainabla, POI1tT 4. So as not to grant a sper,ial Pr.ivileye to me by the.grant•ing o: this variance T stil�mit the follo��;inq co;�ditions to be imposed so as not to caus� inconsistencies �•�ith thc� ].ir,iitations upon otl:er propertie� in the v.i,cinity aiid zone in �•11�ich x ara loc.zted. That all requirements of the city zoning code be complied �aith except for the lot area requirement.