5218 S 3RD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Allegations of Applicant 2) Assuming Lull utilization of the site, population density on the site would be less for a duplex than for the present single fartiily confiauration Uecause total bedroom count cuould drop from the present 4 1/2 to 3 1/2 for a duplex (1 upstairs bedroom would be lost in the conversion). 3) Vehicle traffic impact of conversion would nrohaUly be unchanged, or at worst, increase by perhaps one vehicle. Ingress and egress roads proximate to the site are non-arterial, of low traffic volume, and in no danaer of. any signiEicant traffic impact even in the �aorst case. 4) Adjacent roads are approximately 30 feet wide while tLey are platted for 75 feet �vidtli. The unused part of tl�e adjoining road plat effectively gives an additional 10 feet approximate width to lot on the west (approximately 1200 square Peet additional) and an approsimately 20 feet additional depth to the lot on the north end (approximately 1200 square feet addition) usina street edqe rather than lot line boundaries. Given the appamnt cut and fill limitations of adjoining S. 4th (due to slone) and the low traffic requirements of adjoining S. 4th Street and f9ain Street, it appears unliYely that any street widening will be done in the foreseeaUle future. Only curbing and walkways �vould lessen this "effective" lot area. (The same applies to tlie "vacant" lot to a lesser extent). B. Re the "vacant" lot 1) Site population density for a duplex orould Ue no greater than f.or a sinqle family residence of. the same size assuming full utilization of site in each case. Vehicular traffic impact would be only minimal even in worst case, for same reasons stated in point- 2,A.(4) above. 2) Aesthetic impact of duplex development wcald lil:ely be beneficial, not detrimental to the area. Ocvner has developed architects plans for a rambler si�� by side duplex with eastern view deck to be constructed on the site Uy o�aner if site is not sold by approximately