Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />.. . . . . . . <br />• � ' ' . nr,r,. ...rxo�a�� or.• nrrr,7CAWT <br />ROIAT 1. The fo].lo:•�ing are the snec5.a1 ci�:ctim�Cances �•�hich apply <br />tomy property wh5.ch deprive me of rSyhL•s ancl privileges �•�hich cire. ' <br />• enjoycd byoi:hcr pr.opertzc:, in L•he vicinity undcr L•he identical , <br />zone classification. , . -' •. , . • <br />� Original lot segregation makes compliance with•19.16,.030 for duplex � <br />' almost impossible. An additional lot �Jould have to�be used which woutd <br />drive tlie land cost out of proportio� to constructfon costs. <br />� POU7T 2. The variance T am request-ing �•�ill not be detrinental to <br />� tY�e public �•relfare or inju�-ious to the prope�ties or imps�ven:eiits <br />in the vicinity of a zone in i•rhich'my property is 3.ocateci L�cau�e: <br />The population density will stay �aell within the guide lines ailvwed b <br />' the zoriing code, �'he new residentia.l construction �oill help updrade Che <br />' neighborhood dnd add higher tax revenue th'a� single family residince. <br />PO?:ti 3. T£ this variance is.not granted, an unner..essary hardshi� <br />t�zll continue to th� oo:ner oi this property, ti�e cause c`_ �•+hicfi is • <br />beyond l�is coni:rol 3>ecause: . , ' _ <br />;. PrOoer[v infla jon coSLs_ �ake i�,�,Qf land for multio]� fami� t ^v uni*�• <br />. a better use, than for si�ngle family dwellings in this area. As hou�ses , . <br />would be over, pr�'ced in relationship to er,istin�� housing in the n�;gl�' <br />borhood thus making financing unobtainable,. <br />POI1:T 9. So as not to grant a special �rivilege to me by the.granting <br />o: this varir_nce I Sll}�P.11L' the followinq conditions to be imposed so <br />as not L-o �caus^_ inconsistencies with the 7•i.niitation, upon � otl:er <br />pro�erties in the vi.cinity and zone in ��l�ich I am located. <br />"• That all requirements of the city zon�ng cbde be complied with except <br />for the lot area requirement. , . • <br />