Laserfiche WebLink
public hearing or even notice given to the neighbors. Again, why the difference in <br />treatment? <br />With your letter, you sent copies of many documents including fortns for proposed sewer <br />connection in 1964, water installation work order (date blurred and not filled in or signed <br />to show it was done), a letter written in 1973 from the City to a property owner regarding <br />a check written on an account which was closed, and an investigation report for a <br />complaint about junk on the property (1g75). I do not understand why you sent these <br />documents to me. They are not pertinent to my letter in any way, <br />You also sent a copy of a 1981 application for construction permit to build a duplex and <br />an application for right-of-way use permit for the sar:e duplex, which was not issued. <br />Again, I do not see what bearing these have on the current issue. There is a huge <br />difference between one duplex and several houses. That duplex was never built. <br />In your letter, you stated that the site contained drainage. On Saturday, September 21, <br />we had a rain storm. The drain in front of our neighbor's home became clogged, mostly <br />from concrete and dirt washed down from the construction site. This homP owner is <br />partially disabled and was having difficulty getting around on a street filled with muddv <br />water. My husband cleared the drain. If he had not been able to do this, her front yard <br />and probably her house would have been flooded with muddy water from the <br />construction site. It would appear the drainage on the site is not adequate. And, only <br />three houses out of the seven are partially built at this time. Just think what we have to <br />look forward to when the winter rains really come! <br />While it was good to receive a response to my letter to the Mayor, I wish someone <br />would take the time and effort to listen to what I am asking and respo�d to that. I feel <br />your letter was an attempt to placate me. I'm sorry, it did not. I am still angry with the <br />City, not cnly for ailowing this developer to break the rules, but for what appears to be <br />the City breaking the rules itself. Until someone responds to the real issues, I will not be <br />satisfied. <br />Sincerely, <br />� ^ / �. , ' <br />oc'"`U`��'; %�Fyli'.`z c <br />Gla�dy��M. Bismore <br />Cc:U4fayor Ed Hansen <br />City Council Members <br />