Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />�. . • , nr,r,i, rYows or nrrr,Tcnia-r r . . ' <br />FUZ111' ].. Thc fol.lo:•iinq �.rc thc speci.al cir.ctim�tances �•rhich apPly <br />torny prc�perty a�lu.ch depr:.vc mc of riy;�L� and yrivilegcs ��hicl� are. <br />• enjoycd by•other pr.opertic� xn L•l�c viciiiity u»dcr L•he identical <br />zone clas:,ific��tion. . ' • , • <br />Original lot segregation makes compliance witl,•19.16..030 for duplex <br />almost impossible. An additional lot Would have to'be used which w�:uld <br />drive tlie land cus[ ou[ of proportio� to constructton costs. <br />POI11T 2. 'Phe variancc I am rcquesting �•�ill not be detriment:al to <br />� CY�c public a:elf:arc or injurious to L-hc propertics or impl:ovemc�its <br />in the vicinity oi a zone in �rhich my property is located because: <br />The population density will scay well within the 9ui�le lines allowed b <br />the zoriing code, �he new residential cons[ruction will help upgrade the <br />neighborhood dnd add higher [ax revenue th'a� single family residence. <br />PO?:ti 3. T£ this varianc� is.not granied, an unnec�essary hardship <br />w:ll continue to th� o�•.ner oi this property, tiie cause of �ahich is <br />beyond his concrol because: . ' <br />' Prooertv infla[ion cosLs. make use oF lan.! for mulrinl� family nirc• ` <br />a better use, than for single family dwelling� in [his area. As houses <br />would be over,prt'ced in reiationship to existing housin9 in the nrigh- <br />borhood thus making financing unobr.ainable,. <br />POII;i 9. So as not to g_ant a speci.al privilege to mc by {:he.granti.ng <br />o= this varinnce I submit the follor�inc� conditions to bc impos�d so <br />as not t•o caus^_ inconsisteneies �aith the ).i.r�itatior�s Uj�071 OtI:C'� <br />pro�crtzes in the vicinity and zone in a:hich I am located. <br />That atl requiremenCs of the city zoning code be complied wi <br />for the lot area requirement. <br />0 <br />0 <br />c <br />N <br />