Laserfiche WebLink
a, Findin s: See Criteria#3. <br /> b, Conc�ns: See Criteria#3 <br /> Criteri_ °n N� <br /> The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policics of the <br /> Everett General Plan. <br /> e, Findin s: The Everett Generul Plan designates this propeRy <br /> as 1.6, Multiple Family Residential. <br /> b, Conclusions: The granting of the requested variancc is <br /> consistent w�th the goals and policies of the Everett General <br /> Plan. <br /> Criten� 6: The need for the requested variance is not the result of a <br /> self-created hardship. <br /> a, Findin : The applicant has stated that the variance is <br /> ne�:essary because of an existing four to five foot cut made <br /> Thssre�sulted n the cuhrtent fin shedtelevationuof h'e structuf ere. <br /> b Con����a�s; ?�,ye necessary height of the retaining wall <br /> ppropriate setbackstcould have been p ovidedction so that the <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjustment of the Ciry of Everett does <br /> hereby order that a variance be GRANI�GD to ��O 1 neor the existing <br /> retaiTung wall to remain one foot from the side properry � <br /> The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRAN dia s from he da et of <br /> final and conclusive, unless within thirty ( ) , Y <br /> issuance and signing of this order by the Cha�rman of the Boazd, an <br /> aggrieved person or persons obtains a wnt of certiorari from the Superior <br /> Court of Wash'viBtan for Snohomish County for the purpose of review of <br /> the action tal:en. <br /> DATED this 9th day of January 1995. � • <br /> ( �� <br /> a� , B r of Adjustment <br />