Laserfiche WebLink
2. �hat such varianee is necessar� f�r Lhe preservation and en�o}�ent of <br /> a substantial property right of t.ie appellant possessed by the owners <br /> of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br /> r'inding: Other properties on tlie same side of the street have <br /> similar lot sizes and front setbaeks, hoHever� the properties on the <br /> other side of the street range £rom 7,000 sq. ft. to 70,500 sq. ft. <br /> and 7,000 sq. ft. is the ainim� allowed in the zone. <br /> Conclusion: Other properties in the same vicinity and zone could <br /> build much larg�r homes and not exceed the gross floor area ratio. <br /> 3• That the authorization of such v2�iance Will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or in�urious to property Sn the <br /> viciniLy or zone in which the property is located. <br /> FindSng: ihe existing scructure Was 5uilt in 7907 and has been <br /> vacant for five years. The foundation is crumbling, the fireplace <br /> and chimney are unsafe and there has been axcavation in the rear <br /> yard, evidently an attempt to fix the foundation, that is a hazard. <br /> Conclusion: The new structure would be an enhancement to the <br /> neighborhood instead of a vacant eyesore that is an attractive <br /> nuisance to transients or children. Mr. and Mrs. Howe plan on making <br /> this their home along with their two children. <br /> 4. That the granY.ing of such variance will nct adversely affect the <br /> Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> Finding: The comprehensive plan desi�ation for the area is single <br /> family. <br /> Conclusion: The use is in conformance aith the compreher,sive plan <br /> and so would not aversely affect it. <br /> RECOtRdENDATION: APPROVE <br /> APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with the following conditions. <br /> 1. Obtain all necessary demolition, building and public works permits. <br /> Prepared by + <br /> I� <br /> Approved by vt. � � � .�" ,r. - �� <br /> -z- <br /> i92oG <br />