Laserfiche WebLink
HEARING EXAMINER DBCISION <br /> RE: AP-#2-89 4/27/89 <br /> Page 7 <br /> approximately 111 feet. Lot 1 was 20 feet wide, while th� other <br /> three lots were 25 feet in width. Thz lot line adjustm : re- <br /> quested by the Applicant changed the east/west configuration to a <br /> north/south configuration. The new lots are identified as lots A <br /> and B. The west boudnary of ].ot B is Tulalip Avenue, and the east <br /> boundary is approximately 53 .25 feet east of the west boundary. <br /> The width of�newalot AfwouldBbe�57a75efeet,West boundary of lot A. <br /> 23, A non-conforming duplex exists on lots 1 , 2 and 3 of the old <br /> plat. In addition, there is a carport on lot 3 and all of lot 9 <br /> of the old plat. With the lot line adjustment, the existing <br /> duplex and carport will bz located in lot A, but it is the intent <br /> of the Applicant to rlicanttseintentrto develop lot guplex on lot <br /> A. It is also the Ap� <br /> 24. Lots A and B have non-conforming status pursuant to the <br /> authority as set forth in the Hearing Examiner decision of June 3, <br /> 1988. Although this decision was superceded by City Council <br /> Ordinance approving mergers, the application for the boundary line <br /> adjustment was filed prior to the adoption of the ordinance. <br /> 25. The original plat had four lots. There are only two lots <br /> 4 with the plat as created by the boundary line adjustment. No <br /> � additional lots have been created. <br /> ; 26. The four lots of the old plat were created prior to December <br /> 1 , 1966 , the date of the establishment of zoning within the City <br /> of Everett. <br /> 27 . The four lots of the old plat were contiguous and under one <br /> owner,hip. <br /> 28. New lots created in an R-1 zone must have 7 ,000 square feet <br /> in area and have a 60 foot width. As a result of the boundary <br /> line adjustment, 486 .25tssquaren�foottlareathand lotnBawill have a <br /> will. have a 5 , <br /> feet8and theuwidth oftloteS�wil�lebe�53W25th of lot A will be 57.7 <br /> 29. Because of the existing structure on lot A, the front yard <br /> setback of that property will be 13 fcet. <br /> 30. The Appellants submitted that only if all the requirements of <br /> an R-1 zoned lolinenadeustmentlbe de�elopede two lots resulting <br /> from the boundary 7 <br />