3407 TULALIP AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

i i I i� li il DOAI2U OP AllJUS'1't1liNT I� r1NDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORULR VIil2IANCE NO. 2G-9U �� I I I3ased upon the written request for a variance from tlte City's i •r.oning code by: I i Applicant: David Olsen � 3407 'Pulalip Avenue Everett, lVA 98201 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant, " for a variance from � Section 8, requiring a twenty foot setback from the front I 0 �� I property line, to allow for the construction of a 11�X1£1' � G �, I carport with a zero front setback. I >H fn ' ` r�-+ �3 IThe 6oard of Adjustment, following a public hearinq on said I K z� application Iteld on November 5, 1990 and further having re- '�� viewed all testimony, makes the following Findings, Con- I � �� clusions and Order: op� I� I'I�NDINGS N!D CONCLUSIONS_ II Criterion No. 1• � � �� I z H� 'Phat the variance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- I y y�'i � traordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, t" F,y topography, or location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existinq improvement on the subject property gtyv� � that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the � �t, improvement was constructed. m y ot�ii a. E'indinqsz 'Phe subject property has an existinq driveway onto '1'ulalip Avenue. '1'he house has a single car yarage I! as do most houses in the vicinity. 'Phere is insufficicnt roon to maneuver around the side of the house to gain I access to the rear of the house to build a carport. III b. L'onclusions: 'Phere are exceptional or extraordinary �. ..� I circmnstances regarding the location of a pre-existing �� I improvement on the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was constructed. r" "- � ! Crit_ e��n No. 2• `• � That the variance will not I.�e materially detrimental to the I � � property in the are�� of the subject pr.operty or to the City as i a whole. , a. 1•'indi�s•. No adverse comments were received. � b. Conclusions, '1'he variance sliould not be materially i + detrimental to the property in the area of the subject ^ � property or to the City as a whole. � ' (` Criterion No. 3: That the variance will only grant the subject property the i � same general riqhts enjoyed by other property in the same area � and zone as the subject property. a. Lindings: 'Phere are many other carports or garages built close to the City R.O.W. in this area. lib. L'onclusions_ '1'he variance grants the subject property the same general rights enjoyed by other properties in the sart,c area as the subject property. Criter.ion No. 4 • '1'hat the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the I � I � I �