3702 TULALIP AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

i 3. The impact of traffic generaled by tiie proposed use on the surrouuding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the ability of t6e proponent to mitigate such potential impacts. Findines: The proposed use is unmanned and will not generate truffic on the sunounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety. Only one maintenance visit per month is required. Conclusion: There will Ue no adverse Iraffic impacts generated by Ihe proposal. d. The provision of adequate off-strcet,on-site circulation, and site access. Fiudines: Only one (1)parking stall is required. Parking will be provided on the site for a monthly maintenance visit. Condnsion: The proposed project will not impact oCf=street parking, on-sile circulation or site access. 5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding properties, including the size, height, location,setback and arraogement of all praposed buildings and facilitics, especially as they relate to lig6t and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and Icss intensive zones. FindinCs: The proposed communications to�ver will rr,place an existing one mimicking the caact samc dimcnsions. 7'he ovcrall impact will not bc any grcatcr on thc surrounding propertics once thc existing tower is dismanUed. The proposed tower�vill occupy Q,.same visual planc (from offsite propertics) as the current tower and the use of the existing equipmcnt building (�vhich cannot bc seen by surrounding properties) maintains the sites status quo. Conclusion: Thc subject facility is located in the central porlion of a 373-ncre site. Thc to�ver will bc visible to the surrounding structures on Rucker HiIL This is not a new towcr but a replacement towec Thcre is an cxisting visual impact«�hich will not be mitigated �vith the nc�v replacement tower. G. "I'he numbcr, size and location ot signs, especially as they relate lo more sensitive land uses. Findin�s: Thcre��ill Uc no signs for this projcct. Conclusion: Not applicablc. z � �