2518 VIEWCREST AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� I f � % BOARD OF ADJUSTMEHT iFIlIDZNGS� CONCLUSIQNS AND ORDER I VARIANCE N0. 22-87 I 'I Eased upon the rrritten request for a variance from the City`s zoning code by: Aick Graff 7003 Woodlawn Everett, WA 98z�3 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. 19•12•060, Height, to allox: a 27.5 foot height limitaticn rather than the 25 foot limitation required by Code. on the following de� :lued property: � Lot 8, Kenilworth Hills Div. 5 25ie - ViEui�.�EST r9vr. � The Board of Ad,justment� follor+ing a public hearing on said application held cn June 1, 1987 and further having reviexed all testimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusions and Order: '' FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: I ; 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the sub,�ect property or as to the intended use thereof that do c.ot apply generally to other properties in the same I vicinity or zone. I� a. Finding: Tl�e applicant is attempting to maintain a �, traditlonal two-story house style which already has been established in the neighborhood. If he Nere to lower the roof li pitch to a 5/12 or 4/12 in order to meet the 25-foot hnight limitation, it would drastically alter the appearance of tha istruoture, and this is not aeceptable to hi� clients. � b. Conclusion: Tne proposed variance appears to be a reasonable Irequeet. i 2, That such varianee is neces�ary for the preservation and en�oyment of � a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the o�dners I of other properties in the same vic.tnity or zone. a. Findin : Similar variances have been granted to �ther II properties in the area, includSng one to the appllcanC ior Lot �� 3 of Kenilworth H121s Div. 5 granted on January 6, 7987. b. Conclusion: 'The variance would allow a property right possessed by other owners in the vicinity. � 3, That the authorization of such varianee uill not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or in�urious to property in the � vicinity or zone in uhich the property is l.ocated. i � a. Findin : No comments were received from other City ! departments. The viexs from this ac•ea are to the north. Since all existing residential development is to the north, east or west of this lot, it will not create view blockage. The property is bounded on the south by a 75-f'oot greenbelt buffer, which effectively eliminates any future concerns about view blockage to those properties. ; f E