Laserfiche WebLink
i , -� � <br /> � <br /> . i <br /> STAFF REPOR'.P TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> V.IRIANCE �3-85 <br /> DATE: January 28, 1985 <br /> Applican[: 141ke Raker <br /> 2706 Viewcreat i <br /> Evere[t, WA <br /> Location of Property: 2706 Viewcrest ' <br /> Requested Action A request to allow a 20' easement, <br /> access to proposed lot 112 in Short <br /> Sub6ivision p34-84. <br /> Existing Zoning: R.S. <br /> Existing Land Use: Single Family Low Density'. <br /> � Residential <br /> Ad�acent Land Use/Zoning: North: S.F./R.S. <br /> South: S.F./R.S <br /> East: S.F./R.S. <br /> West: S.R./R.S. <br /> Exhibits: <br /> 1. Staff Report � <br /> 2. Vicinity Map <br /> 3. Plot Plan <br /> 4. Narratrve Sta[ement ' <br /> FIHDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1. There are exceptional. or extraordinary circumstances of conditions' <br /> applying to the subJect property which do not apply generally [o other <br /> properties in [he same vicinity or zone. <br /> a. Finding: The applicant owns a lot Ic^ated off of Viewcrest and�'�, <br /> 23rd. The applicant's property is 250 x 449' with 20' of <br /> frontage. The applicant is proposing a two lot short subdivieion. ', <br /> b. Conclusion: A 20� access to lot 1l2 woul� be reasonable at this <br /> location. , <br /> 2. The nu[horization of the variance will not be detrimental [o the public <br /> welfare or in�urious to the property in the same vicinity or zo�.e. <br /> a. Finding: Access to lot 112 will be via 20' easement access ever <br /> lot O1. Total trips per day would be approxi.mately [en. <br /> b. Conclusion: This access point would not affect the other lotal <br /> ' in [he area because of ite location and number of [rips per day. <br /> II <br /> —1— <br />