Laserfiche WebLink
Conclusion: A tax lot that does not comply with the condition above may be <br />approved by the Hearing Examiner per EMC 18.28.010. B. <br />2. An application to the Hearing Examiner for a variation may be made as set forth <br />in EMC 18.32.010. When considering the variation; the Hearing Examiner may <br />consider as an "exceptional circumstance or condition" for purposes of Section <br />18.32.110 D.1 which reads "There are exceptional circumstances or conditions <br />such as: location of existing structures; lot configuration; topographic or unique <br />physical features that apply to the subject property which prohibit the applicant <br />from meeting the standards of this article." When considering the application, if <br />appropriate for the subject property, the Hearing Examiner may consider whether <br />the information provided by the applicant was complete and accurate. <br />Finding: The tax lot meets all zoning code requirements for area, width and <br />access. The tax segregation was in 1978 and has been sold as a separate lot to <br />three (3) different owners. Smith and GRC Homes are considered to be <br />innocent 3rd parties and did not create the short subdivision violation. <br />Conclusion: Since the property % is tax s..gregated in 1978, the property <br />has been represented as a single fan . lot. The issuance of a building permit <br />for this lot could be done consistent witA Everett Zoning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EVERETT HEREBY RECOMMENDS <br />APPROVAL OF THE TAX SEGREGATION VARIANCE AS PROPOSED BY THE <br />APPLICANT. <br />The applicant is required to complete a boundary line adjustment between the <br />tax lot, Lot 6, and Lot 24 prior to issuance of any building permits. <br />Report Prepared By: <br />Donald Wood <br />Senior Planner <br />v-19-97 <br />r-P 2930 Wetmore, Suite 800, Everett, WA 98201 4 (425) 257-8731, Fax (425) 257-8629 <br />