My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1918 WALL ST 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
WALL ST
>
1918
>
1918 WALL ST 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2022 11:40:40 AM
Creation date
3/8/2017 1:26:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
WALL ST
Street Number
1918
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
769
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plan Check 1328 <br />Larry Callahan <br />December 15, 1983 <br />Page Four <br />13. a & b. "W" should include all dead loads including walls parallel to <br />the direction of load. In rigid diaphragms the weight of the parallel shear <br />walls may be transferred through the diaphragm to more rigid wall elements. <br />14. Not satisfied. <br />15 & 16. OK <br />17. a & b. In order to remove any net uplift, additional axial load would <br />be necessary which may increase the bearing pressure. <br />c. Substantial top steel appears to be necessary in order to include <br />columns 6B and 9B into the combined footing system. <br />e. Not satisfied. <br />18. Columns C7, C8, and the end columns on Detail 4/S3.3 should be included. <br />19. Please see SEAOC commentary, page 67C; copy enclosed. <br />20. OK <br />21. The stout perimeter columns along Grid Lines A & D should be investigated. <br />(Example A3-A6, and A9-Al2) <br />22. OK <br />23. Not clear. <br />24. A basis for the disagreement should be stated. <br />25. All members of frames or continuous construction should be designed for <br />the maximum effects of the design bads as determined by theory of elastic <br />frames. Section 2608(d) <br />26. OK <br />27. I will gladly review the details and supporting calculations when they <br />are submitted to you. <br />28. 4/S2.8 does not appear to have any significant lateral resistance in the <br />east -west direction.. <br />29. The 3' span moment should be added; not subtracted. <br />30. Not satisfied. <br />Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.