Laserfiche WebLink
There were others in favor of Mr. Olson's request and they <br />stated: <br />1. The alley needs improvement. <br />+� <br />Rl <br />4 <br />The lot is noa� vermin infecte3 so there wotild be an <br />improvement with the lot development. <br />By proper planning the parking can be solved without <br />infringement of other properties. <br />If for any reason the required eight (8) parking stalls <br />cannot be accomplis:�ed for a five (5) unit apartment <br />then four (4) units eoill be const-ructed. <br />Dir. Johnson of. 3515 �Jetmore oras opposed to t4r. Olson's request <br />stating the lot is too small for five (5) units. <br />At-er visually viewing the subject property and considering all <br />the facts and te;�imony, it was moved by "dr. Russell and seconded <br />by tdr. Dlack and unanimously carried to giant thc: variance <br />as i.t meets all the requirements of Section 19.70.0G0 paragraphs <br />1,2,3, and 4. <br />A hearing was held on the application of Bellevue Investments, <br />6129 Ever.yreen :�ay, Everett, WA 98203 for a variance from <br />Section 19.16.03C, Everett �]unicipal Code, to allow for a reduction <br />in Lot Size for %. Two Divelling (Duplex) unit from 7500 square feet <br />to 6000 square ieet. <br />� Legal Description: Lots 1& 2, Block 4G5, t•Sap of Palco;tezs <br />i ',ddition to Evc��tt Divisicn "D" <br />Address: 2201 Walnut <br />Zoning: R-2 Single Famil}� liigl� Density Reside::ce <br />Lee Duce represented Bellevue Investments and stated tltc arca is <br />�oned for a duplex and all requirements would Le met. <br />There caas no opposition from the audience. <br />After visually viewing the subject property and considering all <br />the facts it was moved by i•Ir. Russell, seconded Uy t•1r. Baird to <br />grant the variance a� it meets all the requirements of Section <br />19.70.060 paragraphs 1,2,3, and 9. <br />mC <br />