Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Jeff Heilman <br /> From: Jeff Heilman on behalf of Engineering/Public Services <br /> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007:!:02 PM <br /> To: Kirk Brooks; Tony Lee <br /> Cc: Jeff Heilman <br /> Subject: FW: Non-conforming issue <br /> Kirk, <br /> I reviewed the plans at the front counter yesterday. I told lhe applicant at the fronl counter that if the building was less than <br /> 3 feet from lhe property line that section R302 would apply to the addition. <br /> Section R302 precludes projections trom extending closer than 2 feet from the line used to determine ihe fire separation <br /> distance. The site plan did not provide the din�ension of the setback of the structure to the south property line. Theretore <br /> all of this is speculalion based on lhe building being equal to or less than 2 feet from the property line. <br /> Allhough the planning department has approved the certification of a nonconforming building, they are not revie�ving the <br /> proposal for compliance wilh the building code. <br /> If you have any questions feel free to contact me. <br /> Jeff Heilman <br /> Development Technician <br /> City oi Everett <br /> Engineering/Public Services Division <br /> 3200 Cedar Street, Everett WA 98201 <br /> Phone 425-257-8976 <br /> Fax 425-257-8857 <br /> FfOnl: 1ellM�Ilei [in,nlio:�c'Iindlc�fiL; �.co��i��•��-I.i'rt] <br /> Sent: Wednesday,July 18, 2007 1:11 PN <br /> To: Engineering/Public Services <br /> Subject: Non-confarming issue <br /> Attention Kirk Brooks- <br /> I have a addition proje•:t located al I501 Rucker Ave. The exisling strucfure has been certified as non•conforming. As I <br /> understood earliar in lhis projecls design developmenl and in conversalion with Steve Inglesbee regarding the non- <br /> conforming structure, that I could conslrucl a new 1 hour wall wilh lhe same facade as the existing nornconforming, <br /> providing lhat lhe new elements don't increase on the non-conforming. I have been through the Historic review and it has <br /> been approved as well. M�client has gone into the city tor permit submitlal and was turned way based on the new <br /> struc�ure and it's elenient relating to the non-conforming. The new roof overhang of 12" (which does not cross the property <br /> line)and is in the same vertical plane as the nnn-conforming below. What is the status with this 12"overhang? <br /> I need a clarification on th�;code item. <br /> Thanksforyourlime- <br /> �cff Viillcr. rVlll) <br /> ��I �:unwltino 3' I�c.ion <br /> -4'�--I,I-`l;,j, . <br /> t <br />