Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> I nRarch 5, 1973 (Continued) <br /> 3. A greatcr parlcing problem �vould l.�e crcated by decreasing tl�e parking <br /> j requircmcuts as suggested by thc applicant.. l <br /> � After �risual obscrvation of the s�abjecC properly, and considering all the facts I <br /> � and testimony, it was movcd Uy A7r. lnf;ram, seconded by n4r. Baird and <br /> � unanimously carricd to grant (b) a side yard setbacl: firom ten (10) feet to <br /> ; five (5) feet and (c) reduction of off-street parl;ing from 1. 3 spaces per unit to <br /> � 1. 0 space per uuit, and to deny (a) fr�nti yard setbacic from ten (10) feet to <br /> I three (3) feet. <br /> The rcasons giecn for granting (a) and (b) arc as follows: <br /> I1. Tliis would a]low the 2pplicant to cnjoy the same property rights as others. <br /> � 2. 'Thcre are sufficient hardsi�ips to allow reductions iu the side yard and <br /> Iparlciug. <br /> ! 3. Tlie grai�ti.b of tl�e variances �vill not adversely affect the comprchensive <br /> � gen�ral plan. <br /> � 'I'he reasons for denying (a) frout }�ard setbacic are as follo�vs: <br /> I1. The plans of the applicant can Ue modificd to allow ten (10) feet in the <br /> front yard. <br /> 2. ]3eduction in the front yard setUack �voul l set an undesirable precedent �� <br /> for future developinent in tlie area. <br /> A liearing tivas held on tlic application of Jolin H. A4ecicer, 3013 Victor Place, <br /> I;verett, for a variance from Section 15. 0�1. 090 L. C. C. (Zoning Code) li,-2, <br /> Single P'atnily iliglt Density ]tesiden�. 7one for pc•rmissiou to reduce tl�e side <br /> yard setback ftrom thc minimum of iive (�) fcet t�� a ininimum of two (2) Teet <br /> froin Lhe east prop:�rty line for the purpose of constructin� a new garage. 'fh�� <br /> west fiftcen (15) feet of Lot 13 and the east twenCy-one (21) feet of Lot 14, <br /> Blocic 4, Ready Land Company's lst Addition, 3C 13 Victor Place. <br /> Tl�ere �vas no oUjection nor comments from the audience. <br /> After visually viewiag the suUject propert:y and coiisidering all the facts, it �vas <br /> moved by A1r. ]ugraui, seconded Uy 11r. Paird and unanimousl5� carried to grant <br /> tlle applicaiit', raqucst for the follo�ving reaso�is: <br /> 1. The Uuilding of the new garage �vill not be dettrimental to thc area. <br /> 2. The property owncr should Ue allo�ved to enjoy the same propert3� rights <br /> as otliers iii Lhe area. <br /> 3. .1 hardship docs eaist bccausc of A4r. A1ecl;cr's narrow loC size. <br /> i <br />