Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />JUZ}� 1� 1)%4 �C01it�(�� <br />'i'hc lcyal description of the subje��t property is on file iu ci�� <br />uLf.icc of the Pla�uiing Division, Uept. of Community Development. <br />(FS le 241) . <br />It was reqularly moved, seconded, and unanimously carried to <br />gr.u�t the requested ��ariance for the following reasons: <br />1. Thc lot is of an unusual shape and the house has Ueen <br />designed to fit the lot., and only a corner. of the <br />liouse encroaches into the side yard. <br />2. Thcre wil.l be no adverse effect upon the surrounning <br />neighborhood. <br />� 13car.ing held on ti:e application of Ben F:ong, 607 3rd Ave., Seattle, <br />b7ashington for a ninety (90) day estension of variance granted <br />May 7, 1973 for permission to construct a restaurant and to <br />provide a maximum of fi.fty-t�ao (52) off-s*.reet parkina stalls; <br />Live (5) stalls less ihan ihe minimum requirement. <br />k2estaurant to be constructed on Lot 1, Block 25, Replat of South <br />I�ark Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Central Park Addition. <br />The ninety (90) day extension was granted, and due to fi�iancing <br />wl�ich has now hecome available, they will now proceed with <br />construction. <br />13earing held on the application of Larlyn Development Co., P.O. <br />Box 509, rverett, for. a variance f-rom Section 15.04.100 E.C.C. <br />(7.oning Code), Subsection C, minimum lot size and width for <br />permission to incrcase il�e nllocaable number of dwel.ling units <br />from ,eventy-four (79) units to eighty (is0; units in an R-3, <br />[tul.tiple-Family, Low-Density Residence Zone. <br />The proposed development is on Lots 1, 2 and the south 50 feet <br />of l,ot 3, 4alley View. <br />lt �aas regularly moved, secondeci, and unanimously carrie:l to <br />dcn_;• the requested variance for the following reasons: <br />1. 7'here was no evidence of hardship presented by the <br />appl.i.cant that eighty (E30) units must be constructed <br />on the subject property. <br />2 <br />3 <br />9. <br />Tiie same otcner owns contiguous lot and is even uLilizing <br />a pw-tion of this lot for off-strcet parY.ing area. <br />No reason was presented tahy additional land area could <br />no� be computed into Proposed development. <br />The proposed parking area Eor for.ty-fow- (44) car.s was <br />quc�tioned as to meciing ihe demand for the development. <br />On motio�i, ihe meet.ing adjourned at 10:30 n.m., July 1, 1974. <br />