5206 SEAHURST AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

POINT 2: THE VARIANCE I AM REQUESTING WILL NOT BG DETRIMENTAL TO THE VICINITY�OFAAEZONEIINURHICH �1Y PROPERTYEISILOCATEDMBE�AUSEN�, IN THE The complaining party's proQerty lies to the east of the Cole property. The corner of the new building on this sid�eie21t-�feet from(the newt from the existing right of way and twenty . . � ) right of way. There is no violation at this oint. Encroachme.it does ne� occir until a point ive eet west � t is ui ing corner (ten feet from the side property line) . IIecanse of the relationship of the Sheldrew house to the Cole house, there is not (as has been alleged) any additional view obstruction beyond what would have occurred with full code compliance. The deepest encroachmenl- (eight feet) occurs at the northofest corner or the building which lies approximately twency (20) feet from the nearest neighboring house. CONTINUE TO TxESOWNERAOFETHISNPROPS TYEDTHENCAUSECOES1dHICH ISSBEYONDLL HIS CONTROL BECAUSS: There is no remedy which will undo the mistake which has occured except to require movement or demolil-ion of the building. This would be an excessive penalty to impose on the owner in light of: 1) the innocent nature of the error 2) the minor extent of tharent1threat to the health, 3) the absence of any app safety and welfare of the community POINT 4: SO AS NOT TO GRANT A SPECIAL PRIVIL6GE TO DL: BY THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE, I SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 'IO BB IrfPOSEll SO AS INTTHE VICINITYCANDIZONECINSWNICH IHAMLLOCATED NS UP02: OTHER PROPERTIES The owner is willin� to insY.all whatever improvements are required by the City to offset the impact of the encroachment (landscapino, fencing, etc)