My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3206 WAVE DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
WAVE DR
>
3206
>
3206 WAVE DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2017 8:09:48 AM
Creation date
3/9/2017 8:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
WAVE DR
Street Number
3206
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GeoTesl Services,Inc. June 3,2005 <br /> Baldwin Residence, 3206 Wave Dnve, Everett.WA Job No.5233 <br /> Wall Design <br /> Essentially one wall design was completed using AB Walls 2000, which can be applied <br /> to both the upper and lower wall locations. Due to the variabiiity of the sile condilions <br /> both walis were designed as a mechanically stabilized earlh (MSE) system. This system <br /> combines both the block units and a geogrid reinforced soil zone. Based on our <br /> interpretations of the existing site conditions the majority of both walis will need to be <br /> overexcavated in order to renove the previous wail backfill and any unsuitable soils or <br /> debris, hence the need for a MSE system. The southern portion of the planned wall <br /> localions will probably encounter medium dense to dense native soils within the <br /> designed reinforced zone of the wall. These areas will �eed to be overexcavated and <br /> replaced as designed in order to keep the wall sections consislent and in a stable <br /> orientation. Tapering out and termination oi the actual wall locations, into the native hill <br /> slope at the southern end, will need to be field fit as appropriate. A�ticipated lengths of <br /> the both the upper and lower walls are approximately 55 to 65 feet in the north south <br /> direction, Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 3. <br /> The backslope behind the walls was assumed to be level during design. We understand <br /> that the level bench between the lower and upper walis wili be landscaped. We <br /> recommend that watering of landscape plants with:n this area be restricted to controlied <br /> periods and performed by hand. We recommend against installing a sprinkler system or <br /> soaker hoses that can leak or be inadvertently left on. Native plants that do not need a <br /> significant amount additional watering are recommended. N'e also understand that a <br /> small Iandscaped area will be created at the top of the upper wall location as well. The <br /> same landscape recommendations as mentioned above would apply to the upper <br /> landscaped area. In addition this landscaped area will prevent direct vehicle loads at the <br /> top of the wall location. Therefore, vehicle loads (or surcharges) were not included in <br /> ihe parameters (or the compleled wall design. The wall batler is determined by the <br /> physical configuration of the blocks used. We understand that a three-degree block was <br /> originally purchased and will be reused in the new wall construction. <br /> Stability Analysis <br /> Stability analyses were preformed for the walls using limit equilibrium techniques to <br /> analyze the margin of safety against sliding, overturning, and global stability. The <br /> methods of analyses compute the ratio of forces (or moments) resisting movement, as <br /> compared to forces (or moments) tending to cause movement. We determinec, that the <br /> safety factors for sliding and overturning were in excess of 1.5 and 2.0, respeclively, <br /> which represents the minimum safety factors normally used for stability against sliding <br /> and overturning. Bearing capacity, assuming both walls are founded in suitable native <br /> soils or on a properly compacted import structural fill pad, was also analyzed and found <br /> to be sufficient for wall supporl. The resulting stable wall configuration is presented in <br /> the Allan Block wall design sheets attached with this report. <br /> Global stability anaiyses were also preformed on the two-tiered wall configuration as <br /> described within this report. The configuratio� assumed the lower wall at the same <br /> location as the existing lowest wall and the upper wail set back a minimum of 12 feel <br /> from the (ace of the lower wall at a height of approximately 10 feel. A computer slope <br /> stability program, WinSlabl, was used to determine factors of safety for the global <br /> slability of the proposed wall sections under both static and seismic conditions. The <br /> cornputer stability program was used to randomly generate and evaluate circular and <br /> Page:i oF 7 � � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.