Laserfiche WebLink
Finding: All nccessary City oP rverett cunstruction permits must be obtained for thc <br />proposal prior to construction. <br />Conclusion: Thc proposal will comply with thc provisions of the City's Zoning Code <br />and the Applicant must obtain any required State ancllor Pederal permits. <br />1L Accessibility to public transit, and trafTic reduction measures proposed by the <br />applicant to reduce dependence oi thc proposed use un the automobilc. <br />Finding: 'fhe Facility is unmanned cxcept for occasional visits. <br />Conclusion: Traf6c to die site is minimal therefore no additional traffic reduction <br />measures werc proposed. <br />SPU SPECIFIC rVALUATION CRITrR1A: <br />Subsection 41.I SO.D.I.b. of the Zoning Code - Special Property Use Pcrmits - contains specific <br />evaluation Criteria for "Above Ground Utility and Communication I'acilities". <br />Findings: <br />t 1) "fite site is currently landsclped and scrcened. Tl�c monopolc is visiole from adjaccnt <br />properlies. <br />(2) 17ic proposed anlennns will be located on an existing monopolc and will not resu]t in the <br />need for u new, self-supporiing swcturc. <br />(3) 'Che Applicant is proposing co-location of unlennas on nn existing monopolc and the height <br />of tne monopole will remain the samc which is 152" — 4". <br />(4) Crilerion not applicable. No new tower structvres are proposed. <br />(5) All supporting cquipment will bc loc�ted in an existing equipment compounJ which is <br />laitdscaped and Cenced. A noise study was submitted and ifwns determined that the noise <br />Ievels will not exeeed District I standards. <br />(6) 'f'he new antennas on the monopole will be no l�igher than the lowest scctors. <br />�7) The ncw c.�uipment will be located in an �pproved existing compound ir.ccting the setbacks. <br />(81 Tl�c Applicant ag�ccs to rcmove thc facility from the site if it is unused for 120 days. <br />(9) Criterionnot:�pplicablc. <br />(10) 7 his site is sl�aced by multiple communication service providers. <br />(11) Thcre will be no Pighting rcquircd by the PAA. <br />(12) City slaft'has not requcsteJ the input fiom a third party rxpert because it has not identific�l <br />aay complex tcchnical issucs in conjunction with the instzm application. <br />Sl'U I 1-003 <br />4 <br />