Laserfiche WebLink
See Distributior� <br />Celia Strong S I �� <br />Ma _12,--19�D�—� <br />/ <br />Wall Street F3uildi�g� <br />_—�— <br />We may have to all get our heads together on tliis one. <br />Currently,there are no codes regulating attended parking; and the existing codes <br />seem rather restrictive inasmuch as the parking being provided is being provided <br />to comply with S.E.P.A. rather than parking cod�s. <br />If the City retains a bond in the amount of about $30,000 to guarantee final compliance <br />with the Negative Declaration on parking, I can see no particular problems with <br />their request except that the final stages, involving attended parking do not comply <br />with areas required for parking spaces. (But the code was not written to reflect <br />attended parkin� situations). <br />if we can avoid opening "Pandora's Box", I'd like to get an Attended ParkinQ Ordinance <br />adopted to cover this situation. But I fear that starting a new parking ordinance <br />will rekindle a number of wish lists we all have stored away on the whole parking <br />issue. <br />ALTERNATIVE <br />If acceptable to Drad, we could just not apply tl�e code, on the basis that it only <br />covers parking spaces that are required by code. Since none of these spaces are <br />required by code, we would be "home free". Only problem is that the code says <br />all parking spaces. <br />Your comrrients would be very much appreciated before May 20, 1980. Thanks. <br />CIS:is <br />� r ac �t�,.c�� 5 <br />��I�� �J�2�. �C. <br />r <br />�.� �wy c o�c.�. <br />' y f{ L� �( r� `�,•'v S i <br />) <br />�%!'��������- �� <br />�� <br />_� ll � <br />'j�lan� �4 � / �' <br />