Laserfiche WebLink
IIi �S lATP�t OP '� ]�l�iIS'IIt!►TIVS 11PP@1L �ppg,u, #7-90 <br />Q' A'��ifs F. lY1Y�t � <br />On Novanber 9, 1990, the Hearing Examiner of the City of Evetett (Hearing <br />�y��z� denied an appeal of Kenneth Mayer (Appellant) of the City of <br />Everett's Planning Department's refusal to process a Use Peanit application <br />for property located at 3330 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, Washington. The <br />der�aion was issued based on testimony and evidence presented at a public <br />hea[ing held on August 14, 1990. <br />At the public hearing the City of Everett's Planning Department presented <br />testimony ard evidence that the P,ppellant's property was located in an R-4 <br />Milti-Family Density Zone and that the proposed office use of the Appellant <br />was not an allowed use pursiant to the Everett Zoning Code that becane <br />effective on January 13, 1990. <br />SUbsequent to the decision, tl�e City of Everett's Planniny Depa�tment <br />co�in a lG� �e��'' �erfacts��eL thfurther treview, the s E�verett , Plannin9 <br />pepartment detecmired that its original denial of the Use Pecmit was inoorrect <br />because the Appellant's property was considered a non�onfocming use. it was <br />priorateJanuacy13,�1 909 To support this decisione th 1Planning DaPacltrt�t <br />detecmined that �eliance by the Appellant of the utility services to the site <br />supplied by the City pcior to the effective date of the new Zoning Code, <br />created a right for the Use Pennit. <br />q� February 14, 1991, the Evecett Planning Depertment and the Appellant <br />jointly moved �er � Ci�aealso�sahmittedVadditionalesupportlofssaid motiona <br />non�onforming Y <br />Having oonsidered the City's new interpretation of the fa.:ts and the joint <br />petiti� of the '�lanning Department and the Appellant and ro adverse testimor�y <br />or evidence being apparent to counter these positions, it is hereby ocdered: <br />1. <br />2. <br />The decision of the Hearing Examiner, August 31, 1990, <br />is herehl+ withdrawn. <br />The ocder of the Hearing Examiner of Novenber 9, 1990, <br />is hereb�+ withdrawn. <br />3, The Appellant's property at 3330 Wetmore Avenue, <br />Everett, Washington, is oonsidered to be a <br />non-conforming use and an office use is permitted. <br />q, The Appellant can use the pcoperty at 3330 Wetmoce <br />Avenue, Everett, Washington, for office use subject to <br />satisfaction of all requicenents arcl standards oontait�ed ��O <br />in the pre-January 13, 1990, Zoning Code. <br />pone and dated this 25th day of February, 1991. <br />i'1. N,G�O�� <br />J M. Dr sc , Hearing Examiner <br />�d�'� �,�g� �" <br />� ��e��F��',���� <br />. • ��� �da��d� <br />Q <br />