Laserfiche WebLink
8. The Applicant submitted that there is an approximate ten -foot difference of <br />elevation from the alley to the area where the garage would be constructed if <br />access is off the alley The Applicant argued that the difference in topography is <br />an exceptional and extraordinary circumstance that warrants a variance. (exhibit <br />6, narrative, testimony of Mr. Brashler; testimony of Ms. Brashler) The City <br />submitted that the grade difference between Wetmore Avenue and the alley is <br />significant, and the alley is between 13 feet and 19 feel higher than Wetmore <br />Avenue along the subject property. If the proposed garage were placed off the <br />alley access, the garage floor would be approximately 15 feet above the <br />Wetmore Avenue grade. If the proposed garage were placed using the Wetmore <br />Avenue access, the garage floor would be approximately six feet above tf,e <br />Wetmore Avenue grade. The alley access would also place the structure's icof <br />approximately nine feet higher than it would be placed with the Wetmore Avenue <br />access. (exhibit 10, traffic comment and traffic collision report, page 1) <br />9 Other properties on the Wetmore Avenue block have direct access off Wetmore <br />Avenue. Most of these properties on the west side of Wetmore Avenue have <br />been developed with off-street parking. The multi -family structures that access <br />off Wetmore Avenue were developed prior to the enactment of the Core <br />Residential Development Standards Properties on Colby Avenue, which is west <br />of the alley, access off the alley. (testimony of Ms. Weldon; testimony of Mr. <br />Brashler; exhibit 2, vicinity map) <br />10. The alley east of the subject property extends from 35rh Street to the north to 36rh <br />Street to the south. At the point where it fronts the subject property, it is 14 feet <br />wide. (exhibit 3, topography map) As depicted on exhibit 7, page 3, the alley <br />has curbs mat are used in part to control storm drainage. The slope of the alley <br />is to the south, and the slope of the subject property is to the southwest. For <br />access to be provided to the subject property at the alley, the curb would be <br />disturbed. The City of Everett Public Works Department submitted that a <br />stormwater site plan would be required prior to the issuance of permits, and the <br />plan would be required to demonstrate how stormwater runoff from the proposed <br />garage and driveway would be managed. On -site stormwater management <br />would be required, and any on -site stormwater management facilities would be <br />required to be directed to a gutter line of Wetmore Avenue via the curb drain. <br />(exhibit 11, P.rblic Works comment) The disruption of the curb in the alley could <br />have an impact on the storm drainage in the alley, as well as on the subject <br />property. <br />11. The Applicant contended that they did not create the problem for the proposed <br />location of the garage and its access. According to the Applicant, the problem is <br />"a natural land slope that we cannot change, and the height difference makes our <br />variance necessary". The Applicant submitted tnat the driveway had been used <br />for many years. (exhibit 6, narrative; testimony of Mr. Brashler) <br />