Laserfiche WebLink
(�\ <br /> .. . • . <br /> � . nr,r,�: ',Trow; or nrrr,7CA1dT �, . ' ' <br /> POIIIT l. The Lollowing are ihe speci.al circiimstances whicU apply <br /> tomy proper.ty �•rlii.cl� deprive me of righl-s and privileyes �•�hicl; are. ' <br /> • enjoyed byother pr.operties in the vicinity under Lhe ident•ical <br /> zone classification, • . . . � <br /> At this time we have an existing oldet home located acrose' the bo.undary of 2 legal existing <br /> , lots. Thia neceseitates hhe utilization of 2 lots fo'r one residance. Other properties in <br /> the area now eniov the privileQe of one lot for standard sinQle fsmilv residences. At lesat <br /> two of whinh are indicated by exhibit.A enjoy a Leaser front lot than is .now required <br /> by code. ' . . ' .. ' . <br /> � POIt7T 2. The variance I am requestinq will not be detrimental to <br /> ' tt�e public welfare or injurious to thc properties or impr.ovemeiits <br /> . in the vicinity oi a zone in i•�hich �my property is iocated because: <br /> Tf,n da.,atry ...t�i ,,.,r t,o affected bv the erantine of this variance• in as much as <br /> totaj. removal of the exieting dwelling would allow utilization of both lots. The lut <br /> ' • area is subetantially larger than required by zoning: A substantial residence can <br /> . • adequately '= built •ori a lot of 70 feef�frontage, therefore, enhancing the general • <br /> appearanc of•the neighborhood. • . <br /> POI::T 3. If this variance is. not granted, an unner..essary hardship <br /> t�ill continue to t}ie oa:ner of this property, the cause of a�hicli is <br /> beyor.d his concrol because: • <br /> • In order to uhilize the propertv to ita hiAhest and best use, which will adeauatelv • <br /> ' support 2 units� without undue economic hardahip and disruption to the neighborhood, <br /> the variance ehould be granted to allow �d�%ffi{ reconstruct,ton of the present <br /> dwelling un�t and to be in keeping with the character of•the present neighborhood.� . <br /> � 'POIt:P 9. So as not to grant a special �rivileye to me by the . granting <br /> . o. this �•ariance I submit the follo4;znc1 conditions to be imposed so <br /> as not to •cause inconsistencies with tlie ).imitations upon � otl:er <br /> � • propertie� in the �vicinity and zone in whzch T am located. <br /> � • At least 2 other properties in the itmnediate vicinity enjoy a 70 foot fronta�e which will <br /> be the same as we are aslcing. Zoning code and topography prohibits any further .segregation <br /> � <br /> of the property to which I agree a condition could be imposed. �An alternative to the above <br /> , request which would be Less practical and more detrimental Eo apnearance cf the neighborhood <br /> would be to short suUdivide the tcro lots with an irregular boundary.(G��� �7') <br />