Laserfiche WebLink
1 Should for whalcver rca.�n thc 10-day period bc calculatcd lo include the date of the filing <br /> 2 of ihc Appcals Statemcnt, thc appellants hereby give notice thal a supplement to thc memorandum <br /> 3 will �: filed shortly. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Brief Ovcrvicw of Annellants' Memorandum of Areument aod Authoritv thst wi0 be <br /> F.xaandeJ unon in Pcndine Sunnlement: <br /> 6 <br /> 7 1. Issucs for the Hearing Examiner to I�cide: <br /> S • Is a final decision on the project premature when the localion of the property line on <br /> 9 which the project rclics is under litigation? <br /> 10 • Should thc owncr/buildcr�:obligalcd lo comply wilh thc requirements of the <br /> 11 L'vcrctl Municipal Codc7 <br /> 12 • Is an approval of a project valid when that approval presumes to givc authority to <br /> 13 violntc or canccl thc pmvisions of the rvcrctt Municipal CoJc? <br /> 14 • Uocs a section of dcck uscd as a high traffic path of ingress and egress bclween <br /> I S olhcr scctions of deck nced to mcet mini:num safcty rcquiremenls7 <br /> 1 G 2. Rclicf Requested: <br /> 17 'I7�c ap�llants scck thc following rclicf: <br /> 1 R • '1'hat tinul approvaUdccision on the projcct bc, withheld until thc Iegal location of the <br /> 19 pro�rty linc at issuc in the project is resolved through Ihe pending litigation on this <br /> 20 subjcct. <br /> 21 And lhat should revicw continuc prima tacic <br /> 22 • 71�at tlic buildcrs, thc Itcinertscns, tx�hcld to comply with thc requiremenls of thc <br /> 23 I;vcrcu Municipal CoJc. <br /> �q <br /> N011Cli OP 71MIiI.INliti AND I'IiNDMIi I'II.W(i OI' <br /> MIiMO1tANUUM01'AI'I'h:I.I.ANI:ti'ARGIIMItN1�ANU CRnitrUn.woani:3225Suo�uiAveEvtxF7T.WA9820J <br /> �S Alf17N)RI7VORS111'PI.IIMh:Nf'ID'111EMI:MORANDUM-J �25J5).7120 <br /> '���' EXHIBIT #�- <br /> PAGE�F� <br />