My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SHORE AVE
>
3301
>
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2017 6:31:01 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 6:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SHORE AVE
Street Number
3301
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I On May 30, 2003,thc appellanis talked to E3ecky Fauver at ihe Planning Depazlment Service <br /> 2 Counter and she stated Mr. Reinerlsen had been in earlier that day and that he v as ceasing <br /> 3 construction of the deck to work on a pertnit application--the appellants retumed home to find <br /> 4 Mr. Reinerlsen continuing conswction of his deck. Mr. Reinertsen stated he did not intend to get a <br /> 5 permit. The appellants infortned Mr. Reinertsen he needeci to get u pertnit. Craig Dilworth called <br /> 6 Mr. Reinertsen the 1'ollowing Sunday to wnfirtn/reiterate thal Mr. Reinertsen needed to get a permit <br /> 7 for his deck projcct(Deposiiion of Kaaren Reinerlsen, DP KR page 68 lines 13-23). <br /> 8 On May 30,2005 a p;rmit application was filed(entire contenq of the file for site 3301 Shore <br /> 9 Avenue is hereby included via reference). "I'he permit application was approved on June 3, 2005 <br /> I 0 commcnting,"5' sctback requircd if ovcr 36" in height above cxisting gradd'and"height limitation <br /> I 1 36"wilhin 5' setback". A verbal complaint was made on June 12, 2003 involving a unique-to-the- <br /> 12 project doublc/temaced footing within the required setback that showed intent of ihc builder to <br /> 13 violate height reslrictions,and that the deck was be:ing consWcted further down grade than on the <br /> 14 pl:ins. On Junc 13, 2003,1'ony Lee of thc Planning Department wrote the"deck is constructed as <br /> 15 per plans:' <br /> I C On March 3, 2004 the Kcinertsens initiated a lawsuit(cause N04-2-08016-7)against the <br /> 17 appcllants involving the property line rclied upon in the plans for building project. At trial, Mr. <br /> 1 R itcinerlsen stated that the numbers on the plans submiued to the planning depMment do not meet <br /> 19 the actual construction, stating that Qie numbers are "not exact figures for meAsuring to or from" <br /> 20 a�id that thc plan submittcd "onlv fulflls the requirements the city says", furlher cxplaining"you <br /> 21 have to put in somclhine that the}• trclieve suffices their building rcquirement"(Record of <br /> 22 Procecding, RI' 102 lincs 14-23). <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> At1iMORANUUMOfAPI'1!LI.AMS'ARGUMIiN7'ANU Crtn1olN�watnr,J225SnorteAv[EVFne77,WA98207 <br /> ZS AUI'I{ORII'Y ANIllOR tiUPPI.IiMLM 7'O MIiMORANUUM•J 125353-7120 <br /> or w <br /> EXNIBIT �_Z <br /> PAGE.�Q F� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.