My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SHORE AVE
>
3301
>
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2017 6:31:01 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 6:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SHORE AVE
Street Number
3301
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 particulaz class or group or persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by <br /> 2 pravisions of this titic." <br /> 3 Failure to hold thc builders to their obligation of complying with the code creates a separate <br /> 4 class of citizen 1'or which thc laws of our socicty do not appear to apply. <br /> 5 iii. The I3uilders Have Failed to Com�ly With the Everett Municipal Code <br /> G Thc builders have not attcmpted to obtain p:rtnits or approval for building projects as <br /> 7 rcquired by thc EMC,a concern duly raised in thc appella�its' Septembcr 27, 2005 Ietter. <br /> R Failure to obtain pertnils is a violation of EMC 41.050, which states in relevant part"no <br /> 9 pe;rson, firm or corporation shall erect,consWct,enlarge, alter,repair, move, remove,convert or <br /> 10 I dcmolish,equip, usc, occupy,or maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same to <br /> I 1 bc done wilhout obtaining a building permit." <br /> 12 In dcposition, Mr. Reincrtsen admits ro changing his roof`Yhree times". One such time thc <br /> 13 builJers madc an extensive changc by altering and enlarging their entire roof stnicture of lheir <br /> 14 dwelling Gom a (lat roof to a pitchcd roof swcture,extending eves out such lhat they are in <br /> I S violation of rcquircd setback measurements thc huildcrs themselves have sapplied on their recent <br /> 16 plans(see aUnched survcy by Mr. Krell, A.S.P.I). Roof eves do not fall into an exception under <br /> 17 EMC 39.150(c) 2. <br /> I8 At trial, Mr. ltcinertsen(afler first denyinb he ever had a conflict with his neighbor on the <br /> 19 othcr sidc 1, admiucd,once a knowledgcable witness was present,that another un-permitted <br /> 20 rcmudcling of an acccssory noi:confomiing structurc such that il became even more nonconforming <br /> 21 caused a contlict witli his ncignbor on that side. As in the current conflict caused y yet another <br /> 22 encroaching building projcct by thc builder, this conflict with his other ncighbors also intensified io <br /> 23 the point wherc lu�vycrs bccame involved on each side. lt is of note that Mr. Reinertsen lied under <br /> 24 <br /> M1ICMOIiANDUMOFAPPCLI.AM'.l"AR(iUM1iM'ANU CMIGUII.Wo0.ni;3225SHOReAV1iF.N;RF.Tf,WA9S203 <br /> ?5 AU7710RIIl'ANU/URtiI, i.liMliN1'1'OMIiMORAM)UM-7 425J53J120 <br /> of 14 <br /> EXHIBIT #�� <br /> PAGE�F.a� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.