Laserfiche WebLink
appro�ing anothcr conflict-causing construction projcct cvcn whcn thcrc arc no <br /> rccurds of�any permits, ccrtification, or approval for this projcct,and this projcct <br /> is itsclf also in violation of thc LMC. <br /> 2) 'I�hc responsc by Tony Lec �nd 13ccky f'auvcr, cvcn aRer having lxen informed of <br /> the builder's efforts of deception and the minimum safcty rcyuirements, is in crr: <br /> code violations continue to exist. 'll�c excuses oflered by thcm in thc namc of <br /> your dcpartmcnt fail to allcviatc thc codc violations and raisc yucstions <br /> conccrning thcir com�:tencc and intcgrity. <br /> 3) Thc property linc involved with this permit is undcr litigalion and as such an� <br /> permit approvals in rcgards to it arc prematura Also, no mattcr whcro thc <br /> property line is detertnined to ultimatcly be, thc �x:rniit on its tace shoulJ bc <br /> revokcd duc to its comaining cxits and mcans ol'cgress componcnts that fall <br /> bclow Uic minimum safcty rcyuircmcnts, sExcifically thc minimum width <br /> rcyuircmcnts. In uddition, no maltcr whcro thc property linc is ultimatcly <br /> dcicnnined to bc, thc dcck is still ovcr thc maximum alluwablc hcight <br /> rcyuircincnts within a sidc sctback dcspitc thc builJcr's nttcmpt tu obscurc this by <br /> tcrracing Ihc basc pedcstal and bringing in gravcl to hacklill thc cntire arca undcr <br /> Ihc dcck within Uic rcyuircd sidc setback. <br /> 1. Admission by liuilder/ApplicaM of Supplyin� False Numbers on Permit, and <br /> Furlhcr Abu.res by f3uilJcr of thc Cndc and Implication of Your Dcpartmcnt in <br /> Approvin�;Such Abuscs. <br /> I.arry Rcincrtscn has admitt�i in opcn court (causc numbcr 04-2-03016-7) that <br /> thc numbcrs on his pcmiit application arc"not exact ligures for mcasuring to or froni'; <br /> Ihat "olhcr numbcrs on hcrc arc nut cxact cithcc 22 fcct mcry not bc 22 Icct'; and that his <br /> inlcnt with thc pcmiit was to givc your dcpartmcnt whatcvcr falsc numhcrs hc could in <br /> ordcr lu dcccivc lhc rcvicwcrs into approving somcthing hc knows is not in codc. Mr. <br /> Ruincrtscn cxplains, .•...}'ou havc to put in somcthing that lhcy �thc City of Hvcrctt <br /> Planning Dcpartmcnt� bclicve sul7ices thcir building rcyuiremcnt". Attached is thc <br /> rcicv:ml pagc 102. <br /> Mr. Rcincrtscn is the one who initialed the abovc lawsuit after he was encouraged <br /> by his succcssliil dupin�;af your dcpartmcnl and your dcpartmcnCs lailurc to sec through <br /> his nisc dcspitc our complaints bath vcrbal anJ writtcn cxposing his attcmptcd dcccption. <br /> I3c.iware Ihat inilially Mc licinertsen did not c��en have a pcnnit lix his deck project, had <br /> startcd building a deck thut cxtcnded past our Icncc anJ into our yard, and only becamc <br /> involvcd wiUi thc rcyuircd proccss aficr we inlormed him hc ncedcd to get a permit anJ <br /> that wc would bc watching to makc surc hc followcd thc codc. As such, Mr. Rcincrtsen <br /> was wcll awnrc of thc minimum sctback rcyuircmcnls while he purposely constructed a <br /> steppcd/lerraceJ cement pedestal, the only onc of its type on the whole project, and <br /> backtillcd thc wholc :uca within thc sidc sctback undcr thc dcck with gravcl in a <br /> 2/� <br />