My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SHORE AVE
>
3301
>
3301 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2017 6:31:01 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 6:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SHORE AVE
Street Number
3301
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�BIEVANCFS• <br /> As a neighboring property,we are being encroached upon by the violation <br /> of the side setback requirements of the code that these particular development <br /> standards are intended to protect against. These violations impact the standard of <br /> our living environment. The aesthetic quality of the manmade environment <br /> within our living environment has beeu compromised by construction of over- <br /> height and neighbor-crowding structures. The setback violation of the deck <br /> allows invasion of our privacy by canceli�g the screening effect of our fence. The <br /> lack of accountability of the builder to be held to the law in his building projects, <br /> both permitted and un-permitted, has resulted in an environment of intimidation <br /> and conflict with both adjoining properties, affecting the use and enjoyment of <br /> our propeRies. The builder is continuing his history of constructing code- <br /> violating structures that encroach on his neighbors and then attempting to bully <br /> his neighbors into accepting these conditions through conflict necessitating <br /> professionaf legal representation. It is our belief that had the builder been held <br /> accountable for his acknowledged code violations,the builder would not have <br /> been encouraged to initiate litigation involving the same property line at issue in <br /> his current encroaching projecL The calculated intent of the builder to violate the <br /> caie and thc hitherto for success of his artifices of deception have encouraged <br /> disregard for other laws and disrespect of other governmental bodies, having <br /> spilled over as abuses in superior court that we are still in litigation to resolve. <br /> The decision and its subsequent lack of accountability to hold the b�iilder <br /> responsible for his acknowledged violations of code have created a separate class <br /> of citizen for which the laws of our society do not appear to apply. We, as well 1s <br /> the builder's other adjoining neighbors, have paid multiple costs as a result. <br /> We will submit a more thorough memorandum setting forth our arguments <br /> and authority. <br /> p �� <br /> Respcctfully submitted this I O —day of October 2005. <br /> . <br /> , 7 _ - <br /> � <br /> Craig Dilworth <br /> 1J. �,�,/ <br /> �.0 :C�G�'!,C /- t 4 <br /> Guolyn Rygg <br /> �. <br /> la�, i <br /> \r��, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.