Laserfiche WebLink
Gcotcchnical Engincaiag Letter <br /> 3505 S6ore Avcnue Dcck Additioa <br /> Everett,Washington <br /> May 26,2010 <br /> NGA Filc No.827]]0 <br /> Page 4 • <br /> intilvates through less dense,moro petmcable soils and accumulaus on top of relatively]ow pumeability <br /> matcrials. Thc more permeable soils consist of the loou topsoil and the sand soils. Lower pecmeability <br /> ;il[soil may be interbedded in tt.e sand dcposit, which could pench tLe in6lttating weter. Perched water <br /> dces not repmunt a regional groundwater"table" witbin lhe upper soil horiwns. Perched waur tends to <br /> vary spatielly and is dependent upon the amount of�ainfalL We would expect ffie amount of ptrched <br /> groundwata to decrease during drier rimes of the ycar and inc�ease during wetter periods. <br /> SENSITIVE AREA EVALUATION <br /> Seismlc Hazard <br /> We reviewed the 2006 Intemadonal Building Code (BC) for seismic site classi5cation for this project. <br /> Since medium dense to dense sand and stiPl'silt deposits were encounured undedying the site, the site <br /> conditions best fit the IBC description for Site Cless D. <br /> Hazards associated with scismic activity include liquefaction potential and emplificaflon of ground <br /> motion by soR deposits. Liquefaction is caused by a rise in pore pressures in a]oose, fine sand deposit <br /> beneath the groundwater table. T6e medium dense to dense sand interpreted to underlie the site has a low <br /> potential for liquefaction or amplification of�round motion. <br /> The dense granular soils and very stiff silt intetproted to frnm lhe core of the site slope are considerod <br /> stable with respcct to dcep-seated slope failures. However, the ovedying loose surficial materials on the <br /> slopes have the potential for shallow sloughing failures duting seismic events. Such evnnts should not <br /> affect the planned stnictures provided the foundations ane desig�ed with the rocommendcd utback from <br /> the face ofthe slope as described in the Structure Setback subsection oft6is letter. <br /> Erosion Hazard <br /> Thc erosion ha7ard criteria used for detemilnation of affected areas includes soil typc, slope �adient, <br /> vegetation cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion sensitivity is related to vegetative cover and <br /> the specific surface soil types,which are nlated to tlie underlying gcologic soil units. The Soil Survcv of <br /> Snohomish Countv Arca. Wastuneton by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) was reviewed to <br /> determine the erosion hazard of the on-site soils. T6e site surface soils were classified using the SCS <br /> classification system as Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 70 percent slopes. This unit is <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOClATES, INC. / � i <br /> S �� <br />