Laserfiche WebLink
U� � � u � <br /> `iilvcr I,nlco Conn:utnity Cow�ci2 <br /> CI I I l�UIiI�CIL OFFICE �ctobr.t' 1f2� 1J7J <br /> � livorett City Council <br /> City llnll <br /> Cvcrott� 1Y.1 �J8101 <br /> Re : Proposed Uothne Property De�.elopment. �e r , ('?, I �i7`j �6� �� h�<<•�-��»� , <br /> Denr Council lfembera s <br /> Lnst night tl�e Silver Lalce Conununity Council met and pasaed tlie follo�ring <br /> resolutions re�u+�rding Lhe pi•opuned Datl�ne Property Develo;a�ent nnd tl�o <br /> rumificntions of condos or. the lntce. 'Che resolutiuns kere o�posed Uy one <br /> member of the Silver Li;.e Couc�cil — Don 5trathey, <br /> . 1. Silver Lu(ce Council oppases uny development on Silver Laice in <br /> conflict Kitl� the intent of tl�e "Shoreline S;nster Yro�;rum for the <br /> City of Everett" npproved Junuary 1�J76, <br /> 2. Silvcr Lulce Council requests a review of zauing policios in , <br /> re��urd to �raterfront residential developmentn as stnted in RC1Y <br /> �J0.54,a90 ns required by st�ite lnw, ' <br /> I3. Silvcr Ia�lce Council �rould su-,iport the developmeut of the nor— <br /> , tion of tlie Doti�ne project tliut confoncs to the Shoroline �:aster <br /> Iprogrnm, <br /> I 9. '�Ve request a comprehensive ,�lan pertuining to Silver La1;e nnd <br /> ilie aurrounding areu nddressing the necd for pnrlc expuusion for use <br /> by future �eucrntimia such ua n atrip purk oroun3 Silvcr I.1i:e itnd� <br /> or ngre:;sive Innd aquisition ns pnrcels Uecoc:e o��ailaUle by both <br /> citq �vd county. <br /> '.�'e huve n tu�enty to tl�irty ninute ��rescutation ta mnice nfter tlic developer� <br /> huve iunde tLeirs. Our strnte�y is to �rhor tt�e i�.ys thc develow�ent dor.s not <br /> i meet tl:r. intent of �verett's Slioreline d:uater Pro��rnm� Ynrlcs und Open Space <br /> � Plnns (pnrt of the :'horeliue h;+ister Pro�ruo) und the Iialpriu Study. ;.;ore <br /> specifically: <br /> i L. 9'l�e lalcc is u finite resource — t;ie only naiw� fresh wnter <br /> lulce in ttie city af Lverett vith ?ossi�ility for more �uU'ic <br /> nccess. <br /> 2. TLe plunned develo;w�ent does not co�iforci to eaistin� residentiul <br /> Puttcrn,. <br /> 3, 'Chc do�aino efPect oF condociniums Ueing built an the lalce +ind <br /> 1:r. Strutl�cp':i iotcut to Qevclo� condoa on l�ia pro?crty. <br /> 4. Tlie need for a 1°5 foot aetbr.ck� benefits to future residcota <br /> of the devclo.v:wnt a�d sup:�orting docuv�entution. <br /> 5. Tl�e interest of the con:cimiity nt lnrge is not being served. <br /> fi. Ttiere is no nro�oanl for public uccese for prer,ent or future <br /> �enerations . `.ti1�uL in reryuired ulien redefaoping n >iece oS property <br /> n�ed not reflect current property o�mera conditions but their <br /> rodeveloprent pro,os�ls. <br /> T. Tl�e need for more fres2i }ruter recreationnl facilities u�•nilable <br /> for ,�ublic une nov and i�i tlie futuro. <br /> 8. Conflictn xitli the ilul7rin Study — Iivcrett City Cam�cil's 7olicy <br /> resolutions in its adoption. <br /> �J. Policica regu+�rdiug residentiul devclo�xuent n1on6 shorelines— <br /> zoning policics — huve not becn revicwed as required by Stnte Lie, <br /> Tlieye sroulei nffect the propooed Sevelopcient. <br /> t5'r, L.�ve n fise miuuto Al1lIC �1CC9CIIL�i{,3011 to follon' tlic ori�l onr uhowing <br /> Silvcr L�ice� Bevr.rly Lulro und Grecu L'�1;c. Don Str.tthny in r,ain�; Lo Uc �ivin� <br /> n wi�writy rc,�ort. <br /> Siucnroly� <br /> / . � /`, <br /> j//l�'�K��Ct.-;/�'', <br /> _� / <br /> �:�l:l `�C¢t.Otl <br />