Laserfiche WebLink
s9n , <br /> _ - � z; <br /> Dece:�ber 19, li7�9 � <br /> s�to:ieLzvE PLat�,zT - (cr �9io-4�� 9) <br /> Dennis Gregoire revieued the rec�uest io7. con;trilcti_on of 45 conduminium <br /> units at 11807 S•7. Sil•��ei- Lake Dr. Ite said the hearing ha4 been held on � <br /> the request of t4r. Bor.hne at the Planning Conunission mecting and they had <br /> voted a 3-2 vote, which did not meet the legal requirer.ients and had to ' <br /> be referre.i to the Co�mcil for action. ' <br /> f[e said the Council had heard this in 2 prior hearings anci if there were <br /> any questions further he ��ould he happy to answer them. <br /> Councilman Pope asked if adequate fire protection woul.d be here if needed, <br /> and Dennis Derickson, Planninq Director, said the Volunteer Fire District <br /> ;11 could ruspond to the area and the I'ire Department was not concerned <br /> about the nroblem because of this. <br /> t9r. Greyoire then said a 13th condition had been added to the Pla�niny <br /> Commission' s report and tliis was as follows: "Participation in the <br /> program to fund the south end sewer interceptor improven�nt shall be r.e- <br /> quired. ° He requestefi this be added to the conditions if the Council <br /> aY�roved the permit. <br /> Councilman Langus asked how many units could Ue constr.ucted under the <br /> present zone, and f4r, r,regoire said that R-4 allows fo: about 200 units <br /> although . it e�ould be difficult to do this because of providing enough <br /> parking in the area. <br /> President Aldcroft asl:ed if any Council member wish��d Lo ask any further <br /> quest_ons of i4r. Gregr�ire, and Councilman t�iichelson as):ed o;hy the Planning <br /> Commission members had voted no. b1r. Gregoire replied that their reasons <br /> for voting no were 1) the Shoreline P4aster Plan had not: been undated since <br /> 1976 and also they felt the R-4 zone �vas not nn ul���rour-iatc� zoninq for t:his <br /> area. <br /> hto�•ed by Councilman Overstreet; s�cond�d by C;�unci.l.i�,in Gi.p:,:on, to adopt: <br /> thc fin3ings as presented by the Plattning Coruiission and during the Public <br /> kiearing and grant a 5lioreline [lanagement Permit for. ;he cunstr.uct:i.on of <br /> 45 condominium units �t 11807 S•7. Silver Lake Dr. suUject to �:he condi_tions <br /> set fortlt by the Plantiinq Corunissi.on including the 13L1i cond.ition added <br /> today. <br /> Councilman Baker was concerned Uy the developnent paY.tern ar.ound tlie La};e <br /> and felc if there a�as a great density of development i:hca-e was need fur <br /> '- access to �.•ater. <br /> tdoved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman r,ip;;on, to amend i:he <br /> motion adding that a ;0' e�sement be granted to the Citp with the prov.i.;;ion <br /> that the easement not Ue developed into, a pedestri.an �,ath for use unl.i "i � <br /> such time as 50�: of the Uuildable property around the LaY.e, p]us the r:it.y <br /> I3each, caere developed into multiple family use. <br /> In answeriny a question by the bfayor, Arad Cattle, City Attorney, sa.id <br /> he felt that ihis is consistent Wlt}1 the Shoreline I�iar,i:er. Plan and i.h„t. <br /> this type of condition could be defendable. <br /> Councilman Langus que::tioned whether the Countp• could be required to dc, <br /> this, and Councilman Raker replied tnaC she felt if the City �,ould do thi ; <br /> �hen perhaps the County orould follow suit. <br /> i;ol.l. �•ias called on the amendment. ci.ith Counr.ilnen I.anyus, tlichc] sun, Gip,o�i <br /> and Aldcroft voting i;�,, ,�n,? Cotn��cilmen Pn},e, L'a}:er and Overst,�-eet vot.iny �es . <br /> :;��i- i.qn Lr�r;C <br /> ,. .�•°`- - .' '. ._. . . . _ �- �' : . i� -.t.y� .. ��„ � '_-�-.Z;'�.�_. <br /> � . .... .. . _.... . ..-:s . '�r .. .. . _ -�. ,_v:.\. ,.r�>�v-. 3L''.r:_ <br />