Laserfiche WebLink
. . . i ! <br /> . . � <br /> ��� � <br /> ; �,i Conclusion: Granting of this variance should not be detrimental <br /> or in�urioue to other properties in this vicinity. <br /> II 4. That the granting of such variance will not adveraely aPfect Lhe <br /> Compreheneive Ceneral Plan. <br /> A 6 B tindii.�: The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as single famlly <br /> residential. <br /> Conclusion: The variance xould not aPfect the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> i � <br /> � <br /> I RECOl4�3NDATION: ( <br /> Variance A: � <br /> APPROV6 the variance aa requested by applicant xith the following conditiona• , I <br /> I 1. The building footprint shall not be inereased. � <br /> i' � <br /> � 2. The Applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits. <br /> I Yariance B: I <br /> 1 APPROVS Lhe variance as requested xith the folloxing conditons: i <br /> � 1, provide elevations for Flood Elevation CertificaEion and obtain a <br /> I Flood 7.one Permit. <br /> � I <br /> � Prepared oy <br /> Reviewed by ` <br /> INOTE TO DBVELOYER: <br /> Public Worin xill require dedication of right-of-way along Silver Lake Drive i <br /> �I prior to issuance of building permits. � � <br /> i I <br /> i <br /> � <br /> iI � <br /> i <br /> i2382F <br /> i <br /> I I , <br /> I I � <br /> II <br /> I <br /> I <br /> �I � <br /> I <br /> I , <br /> I I <br /> I <br /> II i <br /> I <br /> I I <br /> I <br /> I I <br /> � -3- I <br /> � <br />