Laserfiche WebLink
_. Fiodints: 'I'he apPlicant has scated that their architects have <br /> encouraged them ro constnicc a gerage with a depth of 22 to 24 feet, <br /> which is consistent with current bui�dmg prac��, �ther than the <br /> existing 20 foot depth of the carport• Because the existing carport <br /> rests exactly on the 20 foot front setback line off of Silvertip Lane, a <br /> variance is required in order to accommodate a slighdy dceper garaBe. <br /> Because of the peculiar lay out of the lots at the end of Silvertip Lane <br /> and the location of driveways, PerkinB has always been somethinB of a <br /> premium when having guests. The prov�sion of addrtional perkmB <br /> would fscilitate the flow of trat£c at the street end end Perticu�arly for <br /> the neighbors to the north. <br /> b, ['ondusioos: The exisc�n6 cacport is only 20 fcet deep, the only way <br /> to make the new gara8e deeper than the e�usting carport is to encroach <br /> into the front setback area. <br /> The City Public Works Depertment hss stated that the additionel <br /> paved ues in tk�e froM will not be allowed direct access from Silvertip <br /> Lane proltibiting perpendicular p�B�^�i o would resul�tl►e <br /> from the epplicnnt's dnvewaY. <br /> Parkieg eroe bemg able to accortunodace o^�Y ane vehicle. <br /> The iment of Section 34.060 was to limit the amou� of impern oua <br /> yarface within the front yard areas wluch are most visible from the <br /> stroet. <br /> c�+*�,.�ee Na 2: <br /> " at the verience will not be materially detrimentel to the propertY in the area of <br /> the subject property or to the City as a whole. <br /> � Fj�; The applicant hes stated their lot is at the end of Silvertip <br /> Lene, a one block cul-de-sac, aed a'ould �ot expect a two to four foot <br /> encroschmeM into the fronhsetbac�er�+hole�.��ch of an impact to <br /> surrounding properti <br /> b. e'onelnsioes: A lettet was rxeived from Richerd A. Moorc, the � <br /> propaty owner direcdY south of the site, in support of the variana <br /> tequest is attached es Exitibit#4. <br /> No written adverse come►ents have beet► recei�ed a� tltis time related <br /> to the building addition into the from sdback. <br /> �'.�� o No.3� <br /> That the variance will only grsM the subject property the same gene*sl �BMS <br /> enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject property. <br /> a. �jp�: The apPlicent hes stated that the variance will essenr°�y <br /> allow them the same genere� nBhts e"]°Yed by other property owners <br /> in the seme a*ea by having a sa�►ro garaBe and a place to store lawn <br /> tools, equipment, etc. <br /> The intent of the additional pavement within the front yard area is to <br /> provide angle� puki�6 g�m��e�'to that of the neighbors directly across <br /> the street and other neiBhbors uP the street. <br />