My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7922 SKIPLEY RD LINE 5 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SKIPLEY RD
>
7922
>
LINE 5
>
7922 SKIPLEY RD LINE 5 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2017 10:34:09 AM
Creation date
3/9/2017 9:02:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SKIPLEY RD
Street Number
7922
Tenant Name
LINE 5
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�(pG.bi[.Y� i ` <br /> Y I rA1� <br /> � � <br /> , <br /> � y • 1 • <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> O x <br /> 9 H U� <br /> � Tp= FIJc <br /> � H� <br /> � rxi� lROMt CLAIR �� <br /> yN <br /> � �� D7►TSt March 17, 1988 <br /> 8DBJ8CT: GORDON SMITH WATER SERVICE ON SKIPLEY ROAD OF N5 LINE <br /> �/� �8 <br /> ^.V �] <br /> � y� At a meeting held today in the Council office Mr. Gordon Smith <br /> s presented a request to be allowed a single-family service connection <br /> ��M to the �5 line. <br /> Ny <br /> � r In attendance were Council members Niva and Pope, Mr. Smith, an <br /> ��� myself. <br /> �n. <br /> We discussed Mr. Smith's request in light of current City codes wh ch <br /> require new transmission line service cc,nnections to serve water <br /> districts or associations vith ten or more customers. I explainej <br /> that i felt an exception would be in order in this case since the City <br /> has constructed a 2" copper "distribution" line in this area to ease <br /> � the installation of PRVs on aeveral services which were close <br /> toqether. Since one mnre connection to th� 2" copper line would not <br /> � .� additionally i�pact the #5 line we could reasonably grant an exception <br /> j� � in this unique case. The others present concurred. <br /> �i <br /> The Council members felt that the circumstances justified the I <br /> 1� 'j recoamendation to allow the new connection to the 2" copper line under <br /> ' "� a regulatory interpretation of the ordinance by the Utilities I <br /> , Superintendent. � <br /> (�. � This memorandum is documentation that such connections to � <br /> °distribution lines" connected to transmissfon lines are exempt from � <br /> � � � the requirement for new services to serve at least l0 customers. This �I <br /> � � does not impose any requirement on the City to construct distribution ' <br /> systems outaide the City except when deemed in the City's best � <br /> interest by the Utilities Superintendent. <br /> �� <br /> ��� cc: Tom Thetford j <br /> 1(� <br /> '-� a��� '?' �p�l �'' � �: <br /> uo�. 2592PACE 10 i•� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.