My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5010 SOUND AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SOUND AVE
>
5010
>
5010 SOUND AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2022 12:54:30 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 11:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SOUND AVE
Street Number
5010
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.Sivardctrnm Residence Geologic al ;Issessment Report <br />5010.SoundAvenue Everett. Washington <br />Based on the density of the mapped glacially consolidated sediments and the apparent lack of <br />ground water, the risk of liquefaction is negligible. <br />Based on the encountered stratigr"phy, it is our opinion that any earthquake damage to the <br />proposed structure, when foandcd on suitable foundation hearing strata, would be caused by the <br />intensity and acceleration associated with the event and not any of the above -discussed impacts. <br />Design of the project should be consistent with 2009 International Building Code (IBC) <br />guidelines. For structural design purposes the subject property would be defined as Site Class C. <br />Erosion Protection <br />The natural, on -site soils contain a significant amount of fines and are considered to be very <br />moisture sensitive and subject to crosioe from both sheet flow and channelized flow. Due to the <br />gentle grades on the site the potential erosion hazard can be handled with standard construction <br />best management practices. Alt approved erosion control plan should he provided and <br />implemented. The plan must include, at a minimum, placement of a silt fence along the low <br />point of the construction area on the north and cast sides of the site. The silt fence should be <br />placed as per local municipal specifications and properly maintained. Soil stockpiles should be <br />covered with plastic during periods of inclement weather. Areas stripped ol'vegetation during <br />construction should be replanted, or otherwise protected, as soon as possible. Construction <br />entrances should be rocked to minimize oll=site soil transport. <br />Slope Setback <br />The planned construction will be more than 75 feet from any critical steep slope area. The steep <br />slope along the west side of the property is a maximum of 15 feet in height. As such, a 25 foot <br />setback is more than adequate from the top of this steep slope and the planned construction will <br />not have any adverse impact to this steep slope area. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />On the basis of our geologic research and field reconnaissan(,e the subject site is considered to be <br />suitable for the planned development. There are no active landslide hazards within 200 feet of <br />the property and there is no potential for landslide Ion -on from any adjacent properties or nearby <br />slope areas. The planned construction is located more than 75 lcet away from the nearest steep <br />slope area and is well outside of any setback requirements. Provided the contractor follows best <br />management practices for erosion control and storm water drainage. the new construction will <br />not have an adverse impact to any known geologically hazardous areas. <br />Based on our geologic research medium dense to dense glacial deposits should be encountered <br />which will provide excellent support Ibr the proposed addition. If fill soils are encountered they <br />Gary A. r1imers. PLLC. <br />19532 12" Mow NE Shorclmc. N'n hinglon 98155.1106 206417-7040 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.