My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5023 SOUND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SOUND AVE
>
5023
>
5023 SOUND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 9:43:14 AM
Creation date
3/9/2017 11:28:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SOUND AVE
Street Number
5023
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�dD�rsS OF�' <br />svv.�v avF- <br />SG� s <br />BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br />iVARIANCE 010-85) <br />Basaa upon tne written reGuest for a variar.ce from the City�s zonin�y <br />coae, specifically 19.12.050, made by James Leettoia at 5010 Alki Drive, <br />herainafter reFerrzd to as ��Applicants,'� ti�e Board of Aajustment, followin� a <br />public hearir.g on said application neld on June 3� 19b5, and further having <br />revieued all testi�uony, makes the foilowin3 riridings, Conclusions, and Order: <br />FINDINGS AND COIdCLUSZONS: <br />1• That there have been exceptionai or extraordinary circumstances or <br />conditions applying to the subject property or as Lo the intended use <br />thereof that do not apply generaiiy to otaer properties in the same <br />vicinity or zone. <br />Finaing; Tlie lot is located in the R.S. zone and is 89 X 131. The <br />property slopes away to the east. The applicant is proposing to build <br />a S.F. dwelling antl attached garage that would not be in the steep <br />slope area. <br />Conclusion: The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances is tne <br />topography of the lot. <br />z• That such variance is necessary cor tiie preservation and enjoyment of a <br />subst?�tial ;..•oFerty right of' the appellant possessed 'oy tne owners of <br />otner aropertias in tne saoe vicinity or zone. <br />Finding: Most of the lots in this area have experienced the same <br />difficulty when building. The street at this location is �0'. <br />Conclusion: Tlie application is consistent with other properties in the <br />area. <br />3• T'hat the auinorization of such varianc2 will not be materiaily <br />detrimental to tne public welfare or injurious to property in the <br />vicini'y or zone in wnicii the property is located. <br />Finding: The request for the variance is in the front yard area and <br />would not af'fect adjacent propzrty. The variance allows p�rking for <br />Lwo cars without affecting the public right-of-way. <br />Conclusion: T'his pro,jec� will not aifect >ajacent property. <br />�. That the graating u:' sucn var:ar.ca :a�ll act _dversel, affect cha <br />Compreiiznsiva Gener2i Pian. <br />Findin�: T'r.e Suct�wes� 'r,verer,� ?�ar. s7o;as t;Z�s 2rea ; ou/ac, <br />Conclusion: This project will nave no ef.ect on tne Comprehensive ?ian. <br />t Oli4F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.