My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Trinity Contractors, Inc 3/1/2017
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Trinity Contractors, Inc 3/1/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2018 10:38:25 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 2:24:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Trininty Contractors, Inc
Approval Date
3/1/2017
Council Approval Date
2/1/2017
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Ryan Sass
Subject / Project Title
Citywide Intersection Signing Project
Public Works WO Number
PW3628
Tracking Number
0000497
Total Compensation
$653,910.20
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Document Relationships
Trinity Contractors Inc 4/3/2017 Change Order 1
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
Trinity Contractors Inc. 5/4/2018 Change Order 2
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 used for determination of the relative density of the compaction I <br /> 2 sublot. The relative density of the core will replace the relative density <br /> 3 determined by the nuclear density gauge for the compaction sublot <br /> 4 and will be used for calculation of the CPF and acceptance of HMA <br /> 5 compaction lot. When cores are taken by the Contracting Agency at <br /> 6 the request of the Contractor, they shall be requested by noon of the <br /> 7 next workday after the test results for the compaction sublot have <br /> 8 been provided or made available to the Contractor. Traffic control <br /> 9 shall be provided by the Contractor as requested by the Engineer. <br /> 10 Failure by the Contractor to provide the requested traffic control will <br /> 11 result in forfeiture of the request for retesting. When the CPF for the <br /> 12 compaction lot based on the results of the cores is less than 1.00, the si <br /> 13 Contracting Agency will deduct the cost for the coring from any <br /> 14 monies due or that may become due the Contractor under the 111 <br /> 15 Contract at the rate of $200 per core and the Contractor shall pay for <br /> 16 the cost of the traffic control. <br /> 17 II <br /> 18 5-04.3(10)D HMA Compaction —Visual Evaluation <br /> 19 Visual Evaluation will be the basis of acceptance for compaction of the Bid 1 <br /> 20 items "HMA for Pavement Repair Cl. _ PG "and "HMA for <br /> 21 Prelevelling Class_ PG ". This HMA shall be thoroughly compacted <br /> 22 to the satisfaction of the Engineer. HMA that is used to prelevel wheel <br /> 23 ruts shall be compacted with a pneumatic tire roller. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 5-04.3(10)E HMA Compaction —Test Point Evaluation <br /> 26 When compaction acceptance is by Test Point Evaluation, compact HMA <br /> 27 based on a test point evaluation of the compaction train. Perform the test <br /> 28 point evaluation in accordance with instructions from the Engineer. The <br /> 29 number of passes with an approved compaction train, required to attain <br /> 30 the maximum test point density, shall be used on all subsequent paving. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 5-04.3(10)F HMA Compaction Acceptance — Notification of <br /> 33 Acceptance Test Results <br /> 34 The obligations and responsibilities for notifying the Contractor of <br /> 35 compaction acceptance test results are the same as for mixture <br /> 36 acceptance test results. See Section 5-04.3(9)E. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 5-04.3(11) Reject Work <br /> 39 This Section applies to HMA and all requirements related to HMA (except it <br /> 40 aggregates prior to being incorporated into HMA). For rejection of aggregate <br /> 41 prior to its incorporation into HMA refer to Section 3-04. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 5-04.3(11)A Reject Work— General <br /> 44 Work that is defective or does not conform to Contract requirements shall <br /> 45 be rejected. The Contractor may propose, in writing, alternatives to <br /> 46 removal and replacement of rejected material. Acceptability of such <br /> 47 alternative proposals will be determined at the sole discretion of the <br /> 48 Engineer. I <br /> 49 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> AMENDMENTS TO THE 2016 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS BOOK <br /> Revised: 8/1/16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.