Ordinance 2250-97 - Laserfiche WebLink

5. The establishment of the proposed M-1 zone and repeal of the existing concomitant agreement promote the best long term interests of the Everett community by maintaining the property for industrial use and establishing more predictability for future site users and neighbors of the site. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EVERETT DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The 40 acre parcel located on the west side of 36th Avenue West, north of Seaway Boulevard, as depicted on the attached"Exhibit A,"the legal description for which is: The Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 28 North, Rage 4 East, W.M. Except portion deeded to City of Everett under recording n. 1872524. Together with that portion of the North 300 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 28 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying westerly of Sound Avenue and the plat of Bridle Park, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 18 of plats, pages 16 and 17, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Situated in the County of Snohomish, Washington. is hereby rezoned from M-M with concomitant agreement M-1 (Office and Industrial Park) as indicated by the attached "Exhibit B." Section 2. Rezone Ordinance No. 888-82 is hereby repealed. Section 3. The concomitant agreement to Rezone Ordinance No. 888-82 is hereby repealed. The mayor is hereby authorized to execute any documents necessary to void the concomitant agreement. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file the duly certified copy of this Ordinance with the Auditor of Snohomish County, Washington. Section 5. That should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence clause or phrase set forth in this ordinance or its application to any person or situation be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Everett hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.