Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> � APPENDIX B <br /> LABORATORY TESTING <br /> GENERAL <br /> Soil samples oUtained fcom the explorations were transported to our laboratory and examined to conlirni <br /> or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate engineenng properties of the soil samples. <br /> Representative samples were selected for laboratory tcsting consisting of moiswre coi�cent deterniinatian, <br /> dry density deterniination, percent tines content, Atterberg limit tests, and consolidation tests. The tests- <br /> were performed in general accordance with test methe�s of the American Society for Tcsting and <br /> btatcnals (ASTbt) or othcr applicablc procedures. <br /> The results of the labor;rtory tcsts arc presented in Pigun s B-I dirough 13-3. Thc results of the moisturc <br /> conten[ and dry density determinatiom .uc prescnted on dic exploration logs at [hc re�pectiee sample <br /> dcpthsin Appendix A. <br /> SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS <br /> All soil samplcs obtaincd Gom lhc c�ploratiuns �vcrc ��isually classiti�d in Ihe fi�W aniJ or in our <br /> iaboratory using a systcm based on the Unitied Soil Classiticatiun System (USCS) and AS7N1 <br /> classitication methods. AS"CM te_,t mcthod D 2458 was used ta visually classify the soil samples, while <br /> ASTM D 2457 was used to cla� the soils based on laboratory tests results. These classitication <br /> procedures arc incorporated in the�.,ploration logs shown in Pigures A-2 through A-S in Appendix A. <br /> MOISTURE CONTENT TESTING <br /> Moisture contents tcsts were completed in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 For representa[i�e <br /> samplcs obtained ('rom thc explorations. The results of these tests are presented on the cxploration logs in <br /> Appendix A at the depths at�vhich thc samples �cere obtained. <br /> ATTERBERG LIMITS TESTING <br /> � e � ' it tin� was erformed an selected fine-�rained soil sam les. 'Che tests were used to <br /> Att�rb rs lim s [cs b p 6 P <br /> classify the suil as �vell as to evaluate indes properties. The liyuid limi[ auS the plastic limit wcrc <br /> estimated through a procedure perfomied in general aaord:mcc «ith :\S"I�A1 D •1315. 'Che re;ults a(th� <br /> AtterUerg limits tcsting are summarized in Pigure E3-l. <br /> PERCENT PASSIIvG U.S. NO. 200 SIEVE <br /> Selected samplcs �ecrc "washed" dirouSh the No. 200 mcsh sicvc to detcrmine the rclative percentages oi <br /> coarse and fine-grained partides in the soiL The percen[ passing ��alue represents the percentage L-y <br /> weight of the samplc finer than the U.S. No. 200 sieve. Thesc tests were conducted to verify ficid <br /> descriptions and to dcterminc the fines content for analysis purposes. The tests were conducted in gencral <br /> accordance �vith ASTM D 11�10, �nd dic results are sho�vn on the explora[ion logs at the nspecti�'e <br /> sample depth. <br /> CONSOLIDATION TESTS <br /> One-dimensional consolid;ition test; ��rre conducted or. h�o nlati��ly undisturbed soil sampics. "Che <br /> consulidation tcsting was conductcd in generaf accordance ���ith AS'Ctvf D 243�, using a fixed-ring <br /> consolidometer. The results of the consolidation tests are presented in Fi�ures B-2 and B-3. The <br /> coefficicnt of consolidatior„ c,., camputed for sclected load increments from the consolidation tests ranged <br /> from C30 to 0.-12 It'%day. The moditicd compression index, C,�, ranged from 0.11 to 0.36 dzpending on <br /> depth Uelo�v Sruund surl'�ce and organic content. <br /> ���r�•,�s, ,+��,s�-aur-uu PageB-1 GeoENcir+eeas� <br /> O�rabc�, 1/.?006 <br /> .---_—__.'... __,_,__,._"'^ ' <br /> ._ . _—._ . . . ___'__ _'--�..�...en..-.�.. .: ._-c-_...'.__"wrrYe.w _. <br />