Laserfiche WebLink
James Pirie �' <br />JN 97 <br />March 18, 1997 e 7 <br />Page 7 <br />well -compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should <br />be accomplished with hand -operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the <br />higher soil forces that occur during compaction. <br />Retaining Wall Backfil! <br />Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free -draining, <br />structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt <br />or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of <br />particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the native sand <br />is used as backfill, a drainage composite similar to Miradrain 6000 should be placed against <br />the backfilled retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected <br />to the foundation drain system. For increased protection, drainage composites should be <br />placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled with pervious soil. <br />The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a <br />retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the <br />wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively <br />impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also <br />slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into <br />the backfill. The sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains <br />recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining <br />and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the <br />below -grade walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not <br />acceptable, damp -proofing or waterproofing should be provided. This could include limiting <br />cold -joints and wall penetrations, and possibly using bentonite panels or membranes on the <br />outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered <br />waterproofing, but it will help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary <br />action, from seeping through the concrete. <br />Excavations and Slopes <br />Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government <br />safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in <br />unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington <br />Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the dense, silty sands at the subject site would be <br />classified as Type A. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be <br />excavated at an inclination steeper than 0.75:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). Cut slopes in the loose to <br />medium -dense soils should be no steeper than 1:1 (H:V). <br />The above -recommended temporary slope inclinations are based on what has been successful at <br />other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a <br />relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. <br />Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes <br />should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. <br />Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be <br />made especially aware of this potential danger. <br />2_0 <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />