1001 39TH ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

5. An ana7ysis of whether a,y other reasonab;e use with less impact on the environmental7y sensitive areas and buffers is possible. This must also inc7ude an ana]ysis of whether there is any practicable on-site a7ternative ro the proposed development with 7ess impact, including reduction in density, phasing of project implementation, change in timing of activities, revision of 1ot Iayout, and/or related site planniny considerations that would a11 ,w a reasonable economic use with 7ess adv�rse impacts to the environmental y sensitive areas and buffers. No other reasonable use. or on site aiternative, will have less impact on the enviranmentally sensitive areas and Buffers. 6. A design of the proposal so that the amount of development proposed as "reasonable economic use" wi71 have the least impact practicab.'e on the ' environmentally sensitive areas. �, Refer to the site plan and note that the proposal locates the structure on the flatest, i .e. least environmentally sensitive, part of the lot. 7. An analysis of the modifications needed to the standards of the zoning code to accommodate the proposed development. The applicant is proposing to have a six foot front setLack instead of the twenty feet required by code. The street in frant of the property dead ends approximately 35 feet west of the east corner of the subject property. The street has 60 feet of right of way with approximately twenty feet of paving which leaves fourteen feet of unused right of way. If the reasonable use is granted, there would be twenty feet from the front of the proposed structure to the edge of the paving. 8. A description of any modifications needed to the required fronr, side and rea� setbacks building heigh*; and landscape widths to provide for a reasonable use whi7e providing protection to the environmentally sensitive areas. The subject property consists of an approximately 11, 500 square foot lot with ' extreme t��ographic changes. There is an approximately 50 foot by 50 foot � buildable area located in the southeast corner of the lot with the remainder of the lot falling off rapidly to form a steep ravine. The applicant is propocing to have a six foot front setback instead of the twenty feet required by code. The street in front of the property dead ends approximately 35 feet � west of the east corner of the subject property. The street has 60 feet of j right of �vay with approximately twenty feet of paviiig which leaves fourteen j fe=t of unused right of way. If the reasonable use is granted, there would be � twenty feet from the front of the proposed structure to the edge of the paving. I 9. Such other information as the P7anning Director determines is reasonably necessary to eva7uate the issue of reasonab7e econonuc use as it relares to the proposed development. . � 5�� b. .._ - - , .,. _.�. _ _ `. __ .. _ _ :.� . _. :..ec �L�_ . ." --.n.w7 _ � .� _ ` .x.: . . �., .. .�-- . . .�. .�___ ._. Y. . Wfi .:aa.....