Laserfiche WebLink
CZ /C�E�✓ 1 <br />TO Marvin C. Haglund, Director of Utilities <br />FRo.!✓1�oy VanDerVleersche, Water Supt. & Craig Thompson, <br />DATE August 22, 1977 <br />SUBJECT FAXIILY DENTAL CLIDIIC ICJ <br />CITY OF .EVERETT. <br />I --� v I L//� 4 <br />WATER: <br />Sewer Supt. <br />EVERETT. WASHINGTON <br />were-t <br />The original plan was to extend the water service from the 8" cast iron main on <br />Colby Avenue. We were asked later about the possibility of making the service <br />connection off of the 2" dead end main on Wetmore Avenue. We ran a -flow check <br />on the 2" at Wetmore Avenue and can produce 40 gallons per minute with a 20 psi <br />residual. I called Ken Callahan and explained the situation. His response was <br />that the Clinic would not require very much water and that a Wetmore Avenue <br />connection vrould be adequate. The ut' ". d ^' �" adequate. ali1y ui aWing shows a a service line to the <br />Clinic. This would indicate that their requirements might be greater than expected, <br />.in which case a connection on Colby would be in order. Our concern is that we not <br />lower pressures in the 2" below acceptable limits. If a W3" service will provide an <br />adequate water supply to the Clinic, the Wetmore Avenue connection would probably <br />suffice, but if a larger service is required, we would recommend the Colby connection. <br />SEWERS: <br />The basic plan presented by the Architects would be an acceptable second choice <br />to me except that the proposed 6" line from the manhole to the Clinic would be <br />considered a side sewer. and as such no stub outs for other side sewers would be <br />allowed. In addition, the side sewer has to maintain a depth of at least 5 feet <br />within the right of way. Also, all side sewer stub outs must be 6" diameter pipe. <br />My first choice and perhaps the least costly would be as John has suggested with <br />an additional manhole at the end of the right of way and the extension of the 8" main <br />to that point. Due to the topography of the area, this alternative would allow for <br />constructing the line at less depth than has been proposed. It «o uld also allow the <br />connection of McDonald's to this main if they chose (McDonald's has a long private <br />side sewer to Colby which is fairly flat and get plugged with grease qu` -� often. ) <br />Another benefit is that it would shorten the length of side sewer for us maintain <br />thereby reducing the cost to us of determining if side sewer plugs are within the <br />right of way or not. <br />I presume that Engineering will be requiring more design information such as <br />profiles. <br />I <br />l <br />� AUG 2 •F lsn : D Grry..01_..EVCRF <br />EnBinerring Dept. <br />