Laserfiche WebLink
Meg Haley -. <br /> From: Meg Haley <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:13 AM <br /> To: 'Kate Mallahan' <br /> Subject: RE: addressing <br /> That is great Kate, good work. Separate professions usually require separate specialists (architecture and engineering). <br /> There are those rare few that can cover both. <br /> �Meg <br /> From: Kate Mallahan (mailto:kate@permitlings�ecialties,con� <br /> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:59 PM <br /> To: Meg Haley <br /> Cc: Kirk Brooks <br /> Subject: RE: addressing <br /> Hi Meg, <br /> Thanl< you - I did suggest (again) that he find an alternate resource to dra�a up the plans <br /> in a more professional manner and this time he toct< my advice; I am very pleased and <br /> hopefui that i��e' :L1 be able to provide son'��thin� �dorthy of permit approval �•�ith the next <br /> round. <br /> Thanl<s, <br /> Kate <br /> ���ZTiNGsA <br /> Q� �� <br /> 7 <br /> r <br /> � <br /> �� i <br /> Ka.t�i MallalnaM� <br /> a�s-�iaa-i�zs <br /> �v���c. cnniuines�ccriltics.com <br /> n---�=--- <br /> From: Meg Haley jmailto•MHaleyCaci.everett.wa.usl <br /> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:04 AM <br /> To: Kate Mallahan <br /> Cc: Kirk Brooks <br /> Subject: RE: addressing <br /> Hi Kate, <br /> Thanks for the quick response on the addressing. I will get back to you today after reviewinc with the Building Official. <br /> Regarding the owners concern with timeline on permit approval, the s�cond corrections letter has almost the same <br /> cornments as the first. The timeframe for compliance would best be served by the cornpletion of the drawing revisions <br /> requested. Has another consultant been considered to expedite the completion of the revisions? <br /> Meg <br /> Meg HnIeY�NCARB , . . .. �.:`s � i i ':r•• . <br /> CltyntFvcrc�l .. � . . .. .. . . . � �' �. .. _.'.i:L�veretiwo.us <br />