Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> � Consulting Engineerin�; Geolagy <br /> October 6, 1992 <br /> Project No. 9892 <br /> � <br /> Page 4 <br /> Steep Slope and Landslide Hazard <br /> � The steep slopes cored by native soils are stable with respect to <br /> deep seated failures. These slopes are considere�i margina] 7 '; <br /> � stable with respect to the native soils in a loose condi.t5 ;, , <br /> creating "normally" stable slopes at 2H: 1V, or flatter. <br /> Therefore, some soil creep and local surface sloughing i: � <br /> expected on the steeper portions of the slope (steeper t:�r:r� <br /> � 2H: 1V) with respect to time. The effect of this surface <br /> • sloughing on the structure is reduced by apprbpriate setbacks or �� <br /> extending the foundations into the native soils that underlies I , <br /> j the size. <br /> ! �"' <br /> Steps should be taken in the development and construction in the <br /> � proposed residence area to reduce the risk of any potential slope <br /> instability. These include: <br /> 1. Fill should not be placed on or near the top of slope. I� <br /> 1 This includes yard waste and landscaped planters. R, <br /> � <br /> 2 . Drainage should be routed away from the top of slope � <br /> ; and into an appropriate drain system, j•� <br /> ., <br /> i : <br /> 3. Vegetation should not be disturbed on the slope. Any � <br /> � distur.bed vegetation should be replanted and maintained ��� <br /> until it is established. Pruning of vaqetation, if � <br /> perfor,�ed, should be removed from the slope and any I � <br /> � root bundles left in place. <br /> Seismic Hazard <br /> �� <br /> � �,.� <br /> �.� <br /> The Puget Sound reyion is classified as a zone 3 by the Uniform <br /> Building Code. Seismic considerations for residential ���� <br /> construction include liquefaction potential and attenuation of I " <br /> � ground motions by soft soil deposits. Typically, seismic hazards �� <br /> are hiqhest for thick alluvial (organic and/or normally <br /> consolidated) soils. The liquetaction potential is highest for ( <br /> 1 loose sand and silty sand deposits with a high ground water <br /> � table. The thickness of the sand depos3.t should be considered, <br /> as liquefaction is dependent on the ability of excess pore �p <br /> � pressures to dissipate. That is, if the deposit is relatively <br /> thin with a short drainage path, the pore pressures can dissipate ' I <br /> fairly rapidly. " <br /> ' No deposits which are considered seismic sensitive were E �� <br /> encountered on site above the outcropping qround water "line" . <br /> The surface saturated soils below this line may loose strength � �� <br /> � during a seismic event, creating local surface slides to occur. <br /> � <br /> 1 ' �: <br /> --- <br /> i, � <br /> �.=� ����, � - � � <br /> - -�.� <br />