Laserfiche WebLink
Gcolechnical 1?nginecring L-valuao�n [.etter NGA F�Ic No. 886013 <br />Dtosman Bazement December 17, 2013 <br />Evcrett, Washington Page S <br />drainage conditions, and thc inclination of ihc backfill. For walls that arc frcc to yield at the top at Ieast <br />one thousandth of the height of the wall (active condition), soil pressures will be less than if movement is <br />limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing (at-rest condition). We rccummend that the existing <br />basement watls be analyzcd using a tnangular earth pressurc distribution equivalcnt to that excrted by a <br />fluid with a dcnsity of 40 pcf for yielding (active condition) walls, and 60 pcf for non-yielding (at-resl <br />condition) walls. <br />These recommeoded lateral earth pressures are for a drained granular b^r.kfill and erc based on the <br />assumption of a horizontal ground surface behind the wall for a distance of at Ieast the subsurface height <br />of the wall, and do not account for surcharge loads. Additional lateral earth pressures should be <br />considered for surcharge loads acting adjacent to subsurface walls and within a distancc equal to the <br />subsurface heirJ�t of the wall. This would include the effects of surcharges such as tra!'fic loads, floor <br />slab loads, slopes, or other surface loads. We could consult with the structural engine� ::garding <br />additional loads on retaining walls during final dcsign, if needed. <br />The latcral pressures on walls may bc resisted by friction betwccn thc foundation and subgrade soil, and <br />by passivc resistance acting on the below-grade portion of tbe foundation. Recommendations for <br />frictional and passive resistance to lalcral loads are presented in thc Foundallons subsection of this <br />Icttcr. <br />All wall backfil] should be well compacted as outlined in thc Shvctural Fill subsection of this report. <br />Can should bc takcn lo prevent the buildup of cxcess latcral soil pressures due to over�compaction of thc <br />wall back6lL This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch loose lifts and compacting thc <br />backfill with small, hand-operated compactors within a distance hehind the wall equal to at least one-half <br />the height nf thc wall. 7�he thickness of thc loosc lifts should bc rcduced ro xcommodate thc lowcr <br />compactive encrgy of thc hand-operated equipmem. Thc rocommended level of compaction should still <br />bc maintaincd. <br />Pcnnanent dninagc systems should be installcd for retaining walls. Rccommendations for thcse systems <br />are found in the Subsurface Drainage subsection of this report. Wc recommend that we be retained to <br />evaluatc the proposed wall drain backfill material and observe installation of the drainage systems. Wc <br />NELSON GEDTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />